RULE vs. ASET

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RULE (Adaptive Core ETF) and ASET (FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. RULE is actively managed, while ASET is passively managed. RULE charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for ASET.

Performance

RULE vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RULE

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: 20.61%
• YTD: 44.43%
• 6M: 45.11%
• 1Y: 51.95%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASET

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RULE vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	30.87%
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%

RULE vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RULE	ASET
Technology	54.4%	0.2%
Industrials	13.2%	16.3%
Basic Materials	9.0%	5.8%
Healthcare	6.4%	2.2%
Financial Services	5.7%	-
Communication Services	5.0%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	3.2%	0.1%
Energy	2.4%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	1.1%
Utilities	0.0%	12.8%
Real Estate	0.0%	41.6%

Return for Risk

RULE vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RULE

RULE Risk / Return Rank: 78
RULE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
RULE Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
RULE Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RULE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
RULE Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RULE vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adaptive Core ETF (RULE) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RULE	ASET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.46	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.91	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RULE	ASET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	—	—

Drawdowns

RULE vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RULE drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RULE and ASET.

Drawdown Indicators

	RULE	ASET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.48%	0.00%	-30.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	0.00%	-14.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RULE	ASET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.65%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.25%	0.00%	+20.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	0.00%	+14.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.83%	0.00%	+14.83%

RULE vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RULE has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

RULE vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

Neither RULE nor ASET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ASET FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RULE Adaptive Core ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.01%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, RULE or ASET?

On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RULE or ASET?

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for RULE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RULE or ASET?

RULE and ASET have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RULE and ASET?

They also come from different issuers: Mohr Funds and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for RULE and 0.57% for ASET.