RUD.TO vs. IOO
Compare and contrast key facts about RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO).
RUD.TO and IOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RUD.TO is an actively managed fund by RBC. It was launched on Jan 9, 2014. IOO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 5, 2000.
Performance
RUD.TO vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RUD.TO vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | -0.58% | 7.31% | 22.78% | 19.01% | -7.35% | 31.62% | 8.82% | 19.60% | 1.05% | 9.17% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | -3.21% | 21.19% | 37.41% | 24.89% | -10.38% | 24.89% | 16.60% | 23.62% | 1.73% | 15.69% |
Different Trading Currencies
RUD.TO is traded in CAD, while IOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IOO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUD.TO achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly higher than IOO's -3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, RUD.TO has underperformed IOO with an annualized return of 12.10%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.80% annualized return.
RUD.TO
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -1.37%
- 1Y
- 11.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
IOO
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- YTD
- -3.21%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 16.67%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RUD.TO vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RUD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RUD.TO vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
RUD.TO
IOO
RUD.TO vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RUD.TO | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 1.20 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.98 | 1.73 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.26 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.87 | -0.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | 7.55 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RUD.TO | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 1.20 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 1.11 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 1.00 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.93 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between RUD.TO and IOO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RUD.TO vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
RUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than IOO's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | 1.42% | 1.35% | 1.16% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.93% | 2.01% | 1.78% | 1.73% | 2.12% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
RUD.TO vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -24.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUD.TO and IOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUD.TO | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -55.85% | +25.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -12.40% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -23.52% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.89% | -31.43% | +1.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.63% | -6.82% | -1.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -11.34% | +7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 2.61% | +0.56% |
Volatility
RUD.TO vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) is 4.83%, while iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that RUD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RUD.TO | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 6.09% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 10.74% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 18.97% | -0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 15.07% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 15.91% | -0.36% |