RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO
RUD.TO (RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD)) and TPU.TO (TD U.S. Equity Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. RUD.TO is actively managed, while TPU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RUD.TO returned 13.02%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for TPU.TO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RUD.TO charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TPU.TO.
Performance
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RUD.TO achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than TPU.TO's 12.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RUD.TO has underperformed TPU.TO with an annualized return of 13.02%, while TPU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.10% annualized return.
RUD.TO
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.02%
TPU.TO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 12.48%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.73%
- 3Y*
- 23.84%
- 5Y*
- 16.57%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | 8.99% | 7.31% | 22.78% | 19.01% | -7.35% | 31.62% | 8.82% | 19.60% | 1.05% | 9.17% |
TPU.TO TD U.S. Equity Index ETF | 12.48% | 12.69% | 34.82% | 24.24% | -14.31% | 26.02% | 18.73% | 25.02% | 3.03% | 13.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between RUD.TO and TPU.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016 | 0.81 |
The correlation between RUD.TO and TPU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Financial Services
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Industrials
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Communication Services
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Consumer Defensive
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Healthcare
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Energy
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Utilities
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Real Estate
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Basic Materials
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RUD.TO
TPU.TO
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) and TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RUD.TO | TPU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.46 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 3.44 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.90 | 12.86 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RUD.TO | TPU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 2.53 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 1.09 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.97 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.97 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RUD.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, which is greater than TPU.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RUD.TO and TPU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RUD.TO | TPU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -27.96% | -1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.65% | -8.68% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.33% | -19.30% | -9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -23.73% | -4.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.89% | -27.96% | -1.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.27% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -3.96% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.32% | -0.46% |
Volatility
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) (RUD.TO) is 2.59%, while TD U.S. Equity Index ETF (TPU.TO) has a volatility of 3.23%. This indicates that RUD.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RUD.TO | TPU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.23% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 8.83% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.31% | 11.81% | +0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 15.31% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 16.60% | -1.07% |
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RUD.TO has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than TPU.TO's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RUD.TO vs. TPU.TO - Dividend Comparison
RUD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than TPU.TO's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUD.TO RBC Quant U.S. Dividend Leaders ETF (CAD) | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.16% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.93% | 2.01% | 1.78% | 1.73% | 2.12% |
TPU.TO TD U.S. Equity Index ETF | 0.85% | 0.96% | 0.90% | 1.22% | 1.34% | 0.99% | 1.23% | 1.23% | 1.57% | 1.59% | 1.33% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RUD.TO and TPU.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TPU.TO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TPU.TO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for RUD.TO.
They also come from different issuers: RBC and TD. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for RUD.TO and 0.06% for TPU.TO.
Find the right allocation for RUD.TO and TPU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer