RTYY vs. OMAH
RTYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
RTYY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTYY achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.
RTYY
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 7.96%
- 6M
- -8.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 4.56%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- 1Y
- 11.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RTYY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF | 7.96% | -13.78% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 4.56% | -0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTYY and OMAH is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTYY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
RTYY
OMAH
RTYY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF (RTYY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTYY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.43 | 0.70 | -1.13 |
Drawdowns
RTYY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTYY drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTYY and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTYY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -11.83% | -10.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.04% | -2.65% | -5.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.79% | -1.26% | -10.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.21% | — |
Volatility
RTYY vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTYY | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.44% | 8.05% | +23.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 13.21% | +18.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 13.21% | +18.23% |
RTYY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTYY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
RTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.61%, more than OMAH's 15.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.44% | 12.86% |
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF | 82.61% | 13.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTYY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for RTYY.
RTYY has the higher dividend yield at 82.61%, compared with 15.44% for OMAH.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RTYY and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for RTYY and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer