RTYY vs. CHPY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RTYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RTYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHPY.

Performance

RTYY vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF (RTYY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTYY achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 55.50% return.

RTYY

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -5.25%
• 6M: -5.19%
• YTD: -1.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CHPY

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -11.10%
• 6M: 39.35%
• YTD: 55.50%
• 1Y: 93.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 95.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	$53.10M	$56.24M	$62.00M
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF	$148.97K	$132.76K	$125.30K

RTYY vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF	-1.11%	-14.43%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	55.50%	2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RTYY and CHPY is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

RTYY vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTYY vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF (RTYY) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RTYY	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.41	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.82	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.33	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	15.63	—

Drawdowns

RTYY vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTYY drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum CHPY drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTYY and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTYY	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.42%	-27.64%	+5.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-27.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.76%	-20.81%	+5.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.67%	-3.03%	-8.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RTYY	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.73%	38.28%	-9.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.73%	39.15%	-10.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.73%	39.15%	-10.42%

RTYY vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTYY vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

RTYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 124.76%, more than CHPY's 38.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	38.69%	28.19%
RTYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF	124.76%	13.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTYY and CHPY in my portfolio?

RTYY and CHPY have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RTYY or CHPY?

On fees, CHPY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTYY or CHPY?

CHPY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for RTYY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RTYY or CHPY?

RTYY has the higher dividend yield at 124.76%, compared with 38.69% for CHPY.

What is the main difference between RTYY and CHPY?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for RTYY and 0.99% for CHPY.