RTXG vs. MVLL
RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. RTXG is actively managed, while MVLL is passively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RTXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.
Performance
RTXG vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTXG achieves a -16.61% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.
RTXG
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- -16.61%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVLL
- 1D
- 7.14%
- 1M
- 201.84%
- YTD
- 842.68%
- 6M
- 558.01%
- 1Y
- 1,215.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RTXG vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | -16.61% | 60.90% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 842.68% | 17.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTXG and MVLL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTXG vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
RTXG
MVLL
RTXG vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTXG | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 9.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 3.33 | -2.62 |
Drawdowns
RTXG vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTXG drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, smaller than the maximum MVLL drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXG and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTXG | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.49% | -59.02% | +21.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -48.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.25% | 0.00% | -36.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.66% | -22.42% | +13.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.46% | — |
Volatility
RTXG vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTXG | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 60.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 96.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.66% | 133.11% | -84.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.66% | 139.63% | -90.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.66% | 139.63% | -90.97% |
RTXG vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTXG vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | 7.63% | 6.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTXG and MVLL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RTXG and 1.50% for MVLL.
Find the right allocation for RTXG and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer