RTXG vs. IBID
RTXG (Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTXG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. RTXG is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, RTXG returned 41.48% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. RTXG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
RTXG vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTXG achieves a -4.29% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 1.94% return.
RTXG
- 1D
- 5.07%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- -4.29%
- 6M
- -6.71%
- 1Y
- 41.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RTXG vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | -4.29% | 60.90% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 1.94% | 2.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RTXG and IBID is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | -0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RTXG vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
RTXG
IBID
RTXG vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RTXG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.72 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 7.20 | -6.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | 29.14 | -26.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RTXG vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTXG drawdown since its inception was -37.49%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXG and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTXG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.49% | -1.28% | -36.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.49% | -0.55% | -36.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.83% | -0.55% | -26.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -0.22% | -9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.97% | 0.13% | +14.84% |
Volatility
RTXG vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) has a higher volatility of 18.81% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that RTXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RTXG | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.81% | 0.35% | +18.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.71% | 0.86% | +37.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.00% | 1.23% | +48.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.19% | 2.24% | +47.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.19% | 2.24% | +47.95% |
RTXG vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTXG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RTXG vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
RTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.68% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% |
RTXG Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF | 6.65% | 6.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RTXG and IBID have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RTXG has higher volatility (18.81%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTXG dropped -37.49% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, RTXG leads with 41.48% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RTXG has performed better with a 41.48% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RTXG.
RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.
RTXG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RTXG and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RTXG and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer