RTXAX vs. PRGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX).
RTXAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 9, 2019. PRGSX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 28, 1995.
Performance
RTXAX vs. PRGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTXAX vs. PRGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 11.49% | 13.56% | 1.50% | 7.40% | -11.66% | 26.57% | 3.73% | 6.17% |
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | -6.43% | 21.42% | 16.80% | 25.70% | -28.01% | 9.81% | 52.29% | 13.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTXAX achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than PRGSX's -6.43% return.
RTXAX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 24.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PRGSX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- 17.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTXAX vs. PRGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTXAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than PRGSX's 0.82% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RTXAX vs. PRGSX — Risk / Return Rank
RTXAX
PRGSX
RTXAX vs. PRGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTXAX | PRGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.69 | 0.83 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 1.25 | +0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.19 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 4.56 | +6.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTXAX | PRGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 0.83 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.26 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.48 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTXAX and PRGSX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RTXAX vs. PRGSX - Dividend Comparison
RTXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than PRGSX's 10.26% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTXAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund | 2.57% | 2.86% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 3.11% | 1.74% | 1.71% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 10.26% | 9.60% | 6.73% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 13.67% | 5.67% | 2.21% | 5.81% | 0.03% | 0.63% | 0.33% |
Drawdowns
RTXAX vs. PRGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTXAX drawdown since its inception was -40.68%, smaller than the maximum PRGSX drawdown of -64.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTXAX and PRGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTXAX | PRGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.68% | -64.06% | +23.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -12.85% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.63% | -38.11% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.32% | -12.77% | +9.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -13.55% | +5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 3.35% | -1.06% |
Volatility
RTXAX vs. PRGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) is 4.12%, while T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that RTXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTXAX | PRGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 7.68% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.24% | 14.04% | -5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.04% | 21.04% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.85% | 19.42% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.26% | 19.61% | +0.65% |