RTWP.L vs. R2US.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RTWP.L (L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF) and R2US.L (SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RTWP.L tracks the Russell 2000 TR USD while R2US.L tracks the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RTWP.L returned 12.05%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for R2US.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.

Performance

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (RTWP.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2US.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

RTWP.L is traded in GBp, while R2US.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the R2US.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTWP.L achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly lower than R2US.L's 18.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RTWP.L having a 12.05% annualized return and R2US.L not far behind at 11.46%.

RTWP.L

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 4.16%
• YTD: 16.93%
• 6M: 15.64%
• 1Y: 36.63%
• 3Y*: 14.81%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 12.05%

R2US.L

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 4.39%
• YTD: 18.20%
• 6M: 15.72%
• 1Y: 42.29%
• 3Y*: 15.58%
• 5Y*: 7.27%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RTWP.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF	16.93%	3.61%	11.18%	13.44%	-8.94%	20.68%	15.78%	20.59%	-7.77%	4.46%
R2US.L SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF	18.20%	4.34%	12.07%	12.79%	-11.74%	15.57%	16.30%	19.84%	-7.31%	4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between RTWP.L and R2US.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014	0.94

The correlation between RTWP.L and R2US.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RTWP.L	R2US.L
Technology	20.0%	17.1%
Industrials	17.9%	17.7%
Financial Services	15.3%	15.7%
Healthcare	14.5%	16.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	8.4%
Real Estate	5.9%	6.1%
Energy	5.3%	6.1%
Basic Materials	4.6%	4.8%
Utilities	2.8%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	2.4%
Communication Services	2.4%	2.5%

Return for Risk

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTWP.L

RTWP.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
RTWP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
RTWP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
RTWP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RTWP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RTWP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

R2US.L

R2US.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
R2US.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
R2US.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
R2US.L Omega Ratio Rank: 61
R2US.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
R2US.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (RTWP.L) and SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2US.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RTWP.L	R2US.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.33	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.13	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.39	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.93	4.73	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.84	14.04	+0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTWP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the R2US.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTWP.L and R2US.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RTWP.L	R2US.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34	2.33	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	0.34	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.53	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.53	+0.17

Drawdowns

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTWP.L drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, roughly equal to the maximum R2US.L drawdown of -35.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTWP.L and R2US.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTWP.L	R2US.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.32%	-35.52%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.40%	-8.91%	+1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.77%	-30.35%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.77%	-30.35%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.32%	-35.52%	+0.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.05%	-8.56%	+1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	3.00%	-0.54%

Volatility

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (RTWP.L) is 4.55%, while SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (R2US.L) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that RTWP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than R2US.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTWP.L	R2US.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	5.91%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.96%	13.03%	-2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.61%	18.04%	-2.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.25%	21.12%	-1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.40%	21.59%	-1.19%

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RTWP.L and R2US.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.

Dividends

RTWP.L vs. R2US.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RTWP.L nor R2US.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTWP.L and R2US.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, RTWP.L and R2US.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, RTWP.L or R2US.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTWP.L or R2US.L?

RTWP.L and R2US.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

What is the main difference between RTWP.L and R2US.L?

RTWP.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while R2US.L tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and State Street Global Advisors.