RTWP.L vs. FESM
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (RTWP.L) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM).
RTWP.L and FESM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RTWP.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Sep 11, 2008. FESM is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 20, 2007.
Performance
RTWP.L vs. FESM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RTWP.L vs. FESM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RTWP.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.92% | 3.61% | 11.18% | 10.48% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 2.74% | 9.48% | 18.25% | 10.19% |
Different Trading Currencies
RTWP.L is traded in GBp, while FESM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FESM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RTWP.L achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than FESM's 2.74% return.
RTWP.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.67%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 18.36%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
FESM
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RTWP.L vs. FESM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RTWP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FESM's 0.28% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RTWP.L vs. FESM — Risk / Return Rank
RTWP.L
FESM
RTWP.L vs. FESM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (RTWP.L) and Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RTWP.L | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.67 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.05 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.00 | 7.41 | -2.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RTWP.L | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between RTWP.L and FESM is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RTWP.L vs. FESM - Dividend Comparison
RTWP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RTWP.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FESM Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 1.08% | 0.06% |
Drawdowns
RTWP.L vs. FESM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RTWP.L drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than FESM's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTWP.L and FESM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RTWP.L | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.32% | -26.93% | -8.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | -13.54% | +1.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.73% | -7.23% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.11% | -5.04% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 3.53% | -0.11% |
Volatility
RTWP.L vs. FESM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (RTWP.L) is 5.19%, while Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF (FESM) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that RTWP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FESM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RTWP.L | FESM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 6.45% | -1.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.66% | 13.81% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 22.92% | -4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 21.02% | -1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 21.02% | -0.62% |