RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RTWO.L (L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc) and LGAP.L (L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTWO.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index, while LGAP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RTWO.L returned 8.50%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for LGAP.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTWO.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for LGAP.L.

Performance

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTWO.L achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than LGAP.L's 9.64% return.

RTWO.L

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 14.38%
• YTD: 20.10%
• 1Y: 33.31%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: 11.21%

LGAP.L

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.61%
• 6M: 7.65%
• YTD: 9.64%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: 12.38%
• 5Y*: 5.54%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RTWO.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc	20.10%	11.33%	9.23%	20.05%	-18.68%	19.21%	19.82%	24.50%	-14.49%
LGAP.L L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF	9.64%	20.97%	4.67%	4.82%	-5.65%	2.87%	8.44%	17.78%	-1.30%

Correlation

The correlation between RTWO.L and LGAP.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2018	0.69

The correlation between RTWO.L and LGAP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTWO.L

RTWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 78
RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
RTWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RTWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RTWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
RTWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

LGAP.L

LGAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
LGAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
LGAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
LGAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LGAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
LGAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RTWO.L	LGAP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.04	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	1.63	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.19	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	1.72	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.05	4.58	+7.47

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the LGAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTWO.L and LGAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTWO.L drawdown since its inception was -53.86%, which is greater than LGAP.L's maximum drawdown of -38.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTWO.L and LGAP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTWO.L	LGAP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.86%	-38.56%	-15.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.08%	-8.50%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.96%	-19.01%	-7.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	-24.31%	-5.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.25%	-2.20%	+0.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.95%	-7.75%	-2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	3.21%	-0.45%

Volatility

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGAP.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that RTWO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTWO.L	LGAP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	3.45%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.94%	11.66%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.25%	14.03%	+3.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.05%	17.46%	+3.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.37%	19.26%	+2.11%

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTWO.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than LGAP.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTWO.L vs. LGAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RTWO.L nor LGAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTWO.L and LGAP.L in my portfolio?

RTWO.L and LGAP.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RTWO.L or LGAP.L?

On fees, LGAP.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTWO.L or LGAP.L?

LGAP.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RTWO.L.

What is the main difference between RTWO.L and LGAP.L?

RTWO.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while LGAP.L is Japan Equities. RTWO.L tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index, while LGAP.L tracks L&G Asia Pacific ex Japan Equity UCITS ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RTWO.L and 0.10% for LGAP.L.