RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RTWO.L (L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc) and ISPY.L (L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RTWO.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index, while ISPY.L is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RTWO.L returned 11.22%/yr vs 16.99%/yr for ISPY.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTWO.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for ISPY.L.

Performance

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

RTWO.L is traded in USD, while ISPY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISPY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTWO.L achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly lower than ISPY.L's 39.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RTWO.L has underperformed ISPY.L with an annualized return of 11.22%, while ISPY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.99% annualized return.

RTWO.L

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 2.96%
• YTD: 16.74%
• 6M: 16.37%
• 1Y: 35.32%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 11.22%

ISPY.L

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: 27.31%
• YTD: 39.20%
• 6M: 33.60%
• 1Y: 36.01%
• 3Y*: 28.99%
• 5Y*: 11.92%
• 10Y*: 16.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RTWO.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc	16.74%	11.33%	9.23%	20.06%	-18.68%	19.21%	19.82%	24.50%	-12.79%	14.73%
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF	39.20%	7.85%	17.69%	41.44%	-32.64%	8.19%	41.44%	30.69%	7.99%	23.87%

Correlation

The correlation between RTWO.L and ISPY.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2015	0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between RTWO.L and ISPY.L has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RTWO.L	ISPY.L
Technology	18.5%	97.2%
Industrials	17.7%	0.4%
Financial Services	15.6%	-
Healthcare	14.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	-
Real Estate	6.1%	-
Energy	5.9%	-
Basic Materials	4.6%	-
Utilities	2.9%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	-
Communication Services	2.4%	2.4%

Return for Risk

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTWO.L

RTWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 67
RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RTWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
RTWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RTWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RTWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

ISPY.L

ISPY.L Risk / Return Rank: 40
ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ISPY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ISPY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ISPY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
ISPY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RTWO.L	ISPY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	1.40	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	1.97	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.27	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	1.96	+1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.63	5.22	+7.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the ISPY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTWO.L and ISPY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RTWO.L	ISPY.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	1.40	+0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.47	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.73	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.66	-0.06

Drawdowns

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTWO.L drawdown since its inception was -42.35%, which is greater than ISPY.L's maximum drawdown of -39.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTWO.L and ISPY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTWO.L	ISPY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.35%	-39.42%	-2.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.08%	-18.30%	+9.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.96%	-27.67%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	-39.42%	+9.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.35%	-39.42%	-2.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.04%	+2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-9.92%	+2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	6.88%	-4.09%

Volatility

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) is 5.46%, while L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that RTWO.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTWO.L	ISPY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	10.00%	-4.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.25%	22.01%	-9.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.98%	25.54%	-8.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.06%	25.22%	-4.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.48%	23.22%	-1.74%

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTWO.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPY.L's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTWO.L vs. ISPY.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RTWO.L nor ISPY.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTWO.L and ISPY.L in my portfolio?

RTWO.L and ISPY.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RTWO.L or ISPY.L?

On fees, RTWO.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTWO.L or ISPY.L?

RTWO.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISPY.L.

What is the main difference between RTWO.L and ISPY.L?

RTWO.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ISPY.L is Cybersecurity. RTWO.L tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index, while ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RTWO.L and 0.69% for ISPY.L.