PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTWO.L vs. COMF.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTWO.L achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than COMF.L's 15.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RTWO.L has outperformed COMF.L with an annualized return of 11.21%, while COMF.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.22% annualized return.


RTWO.L

1D
0.57%
1M
1.17%
6M
14.38%
YTD
20.10%
1Y
33.31%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
11.21%

COMF.L

1D
0.39%
1M
1.29%
6M
10.85%
YTD
15.66%
1Y
24.69%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
8.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTWO.L
L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc
20.10%11.33%9.23%20.05%-18.68%19.21%19.82%24.50%-12.20%13.96%
COMF.L
L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF
15.66%16.43%5.13%-6.37%18.73%32.96%2.52%7.36%-8.43%3.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RTWO.L and COMF.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2010

0.31

The correlation between RTWO.L and COMF.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTWO.L
RTWO.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTWO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTWO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RTWO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTWO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

COMF.L
COMF.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
COMF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COMF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
COMF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
COMF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
COMF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) and L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTWO.LCOMF.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

2.00

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

6.49

+5.56

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTWO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the COMF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTWO.L and COMF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTWO.L drawdown since its inception was -53.86%, smaller than the maximum COMF.L drawdown of -60.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTWO.L and COMF.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTWO.LCOMF.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.86%

-60.21%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.08%

-12.25%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.96%

-12.25%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-22.56%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.01%

-29.69%

-12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-7.09%

+5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-29.36%

+19.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

3.77%

-1.01%

Volatility

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (COMF.L) at 3.91%. This indicates that RTWO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTWO.LCOMF.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.91%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

11.59%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

13.87%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.05%

14.93%

+6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

13.28%

+8.09%

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RTWO.L and COMF.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

RTWO.L vs. COMF.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither RTWO.L nor COMF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RTWO.L and COMF.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RTWO.L and COMF.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

RTWO.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while COMF.L is Commodities. RTWO.L tracks Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index, while COMF.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index 3 Month Forward Total Return.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTWO.L and COMF.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer