RTNAX vs. SFNNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RTNAX (Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund) and SFNNX (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RTNAX returned 7.95%/yr vs 11.90%/yr for SFNNX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RTNAX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SFNNX.

Performance

RTNAX vs. SFNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTNAX achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than SFNNX's 21.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RTNAX has underperformed SFNNX with an annualized return of 7.95%, while SFNNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.90% annualized return.

RTNAX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 14.71%
• 1Y: 27.71%
• 3Y*: 16.63%
• 5Y*: 6.42%
• 10Y*: 7.95%

SFNNX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 7.17%
• YTD: 21.53%
• 6M: 25.42%
• 1Y: 45.45%
• 3Y*: 24.36%
• 5Y*: 13.49%
• 10Y*: 11.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTNAX vs. SFNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RTNAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund	12.24%	30.15%	2.73%	13.43%	-16.20%	7.56%	6.57%	19.17%	-16.58%	27.94%
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund	21.53%	41.06%	2.27%	19.88%	-7.95%	14.38%	4.35%	18.09%	-13.96%	23.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RTNAX and SFNNX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.93

The correlation between RTNAX and SFNNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RTNAX vs. SFNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTNAX

RTNAX Risk / Return Rank: 42
RTNAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
RTNAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
RTNAX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
RTNAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
RTNAX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

SFNNX

SFNNX Risk / Return Rank: 86
SFNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
SFNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SFNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SFNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SFNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTNAX vs. SFNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RTNAX	SFNNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	3.12	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	4.01	-1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.56	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	4.21	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.52	15.80	-7.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RTNAX vs. SFNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTNAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the SFNNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTNAX and SFNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RTNAX	SFNNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	3.12	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.87	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.69	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.28	+0.22

Drawdowns

RTNAX vs. SFNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTNAX drawdown since its inception was -39.58%, smaller than the maximum SFNNX drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTNAX and SFNNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTNAX	SFNNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.58%	-59.60%	+20.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.18%	-10.63%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.03%	-13.78%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.77%	-25.66%	-6.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.58%	-40.23%	+0.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.83%	-11.97%	+3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	2.82%	+0.38%

Volatility

RTNAX vs. SFNNX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (RTNAX) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund (SFNNX) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTNAX	SFNNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	4.63%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.56%	11.58%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.85%	14.36%	-0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.90%	15.56%	-0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.82%	17.29%	-1.47%

RTNAX vs. SFNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTNAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SFNNX's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTNAX vs. SFNNX - Dividend Comparison

RTNAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than SFNNX's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RTNAX Russell Investment Tax-Managed International Equity Fund	1.67%	1.88%	1.77%	1.60%	1.17%	2.08%	1.35%	2.09%	1.22%	1.14%	2.14%	0.00%
SFNNX Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index Fund	4.21%	5.11%	3.61%	3.26%	2.92%	3.81%	2.42%	3.69%	3.51%	2.70%	3.21%	2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTNAX and SFNNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, RTNAX and SFNNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RTNAX or SFNNX?

SFNNX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to RTNAX (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTNAX dropped -39.58% vs SFNNX's -59.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFNNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.