PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTHAX vs. NVHIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTHAX vs. NVHIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTHAX achieves a 2.46% return, which is significantly higher than NVHIX's 1.93% return. Over the past 10 years, RTHAX has underperformed NVHIX with an annualized return of 2.91%, while NVHIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.23% annualized return.


RTHAX

1D
0.35%
1M
0.97%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.56%
1Y
6.99%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.91%

NVHIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.91%
YTD
1.93%
6M
2.36%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTHAX vs. NVHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
2.46%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%
NVHIX
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
1.93%2.43%6.88%3.54%-6.73%8.44%-0.10%8.27%3.47%8.17%

Correlation

The correlation between RTHAX and NVHIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.61

The correlation between RTHAX and NVHIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTHAX vs. NVHIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NVHIX
NVHIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NVHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
NVHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTHAX vs. NVHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTHAXNVHIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.65

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

2.75

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

6.95

+1.14

RTHAX vs. NVHIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the NVHIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTHAX and NVHIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTHAXNVHIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.21

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.63

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.93

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.12

-0.45

Drawdowns

RTHAX vs. NVHIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTHAX drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than NVHIX's maximum drawdown of -13.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTHAX and NVHIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTHAXNVHIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-13.54%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-1.80%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-4.72%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.89%

-10.54%

-8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.89%

-13.54%

-5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-2.04%

-1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.71%

+0.12%

Volatility

RTHAX vs. NVHIX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.10% compared to Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NVHIX) at 0.68%. This indicates that RTHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTHAXNVHIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

0.68%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

1.55%

+0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

2.25%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.12%

3.33%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.98%

3.47%

+1.51%

RTHAX vs. NVHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTHAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than NVHIX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTHAX vs. NVHIX - Dividend Comparison

RTHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than NVHIX's 4.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVHIX
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4.55%5.15%4.36%4.41%3.84%3.43%3.90%4.03%3.90%3.78%3.62%3.55%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
4.22%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTHAX and NVHIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTHAX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to NVHIX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTHAX dropped -18.89% vs NVHIX's -13.54%.

RTHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTHAX and NVHIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer