PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTHAX vs. FHTFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTHAX vs. FHTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTHAX achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly higher than FHTFX's 1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, RTHAX has outperformed FHTFX with an annualized return of 2.62%, while FHTFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.


RTHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.74%
6M
0.84%
YTD
1.73%
1Y
6.16%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
2.62%
ALL TIME*
3.13%

FHTFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.76%
6M
0.38%
YTD
1.23%
1Y
6.70%
3Y*
4.48%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*
2.24%
ALL TIME*
3.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RTHAX vs. FHTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
1.73%2.11%4.49%7.78%-13.62%5.54%3.84%10.18%3.20%8.19%
FHTFX
Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd
1.23%2.09%5.67%6.91%-13.36%5.47%2.91%9.76%0.76%7.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RTHAX and FHTFX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.78

The correlation between RTHAX and FHTFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTHAX vs. FHTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTHAX
RTHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
RTHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
RTHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FHTFX
FHTFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FHTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FHTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTHAX vs. FHTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) and Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTHAXFHTFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.63

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.55

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

13.13

-4.36

RTHAX vs. FHTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTHAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FHTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTHAX and FHTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTHAX vs. FHTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTHAX drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, smaller than the maximum FHTFX drawdown of -27.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTHAX and FHTFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTHAXFHTFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-27.61%

+8.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.74%

-2.46%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.07%

-7.25%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.80%

-17.76%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.89%

-17.77%

-1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-1.76%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.68%

-2.65%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.71%

0.00%

Volatility

RTHAX vs. FHTFX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund (RTHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.03% compared to Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd (FHTFX) at 0.96%. This indicates that RTHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTHAXFHTFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

0.96%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.29%

2.27%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81%

3.30%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.14%

5.17%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

4.86%

+0.13%

RTHAX vs. FHTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RTHAX and FHTFX have an expense ratio of 0.89%.


Dividends

RTHAX vs. FHTFX - Dividend Comparison

RTHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than FHTFX's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHTFX
Federated Hermes Municipal High Yield Advtg Fd
3.44%3.02%4.53%3.81%3.65%3.14%3.52%3.88%3.85%3.88%4.11%4.02%
RTHAX
Russell Investments Tax-Exempt High Yield Bond Fund
3.90%3.60%4.02%3.97%3.64%2.80%3.10%3.83%3.86%3.44%4.06%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RTHAX and FHTFX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTHAX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to FHTFX (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTHAX dropped -18.89% vs FHTFX's -27.61%.

FHTFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTHAX and FHTFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer