PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTDYX vs. RELVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTDYX vs. RELVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTDYX achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than RELVX's 10.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RTDYX has outperformed RELVX with an annualized return of 14.44%, while RELVX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.30% annualized return.


RTDYX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.98%
YTD
12.13%
6M
11.89%
1Y
28.16%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
13.17%
10Y*
14.44%

RELVX

1D
0.23%
1M
4.35%
YTD
10.83%
6M
11.59%
1Y
25.34%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTDYX vs. RELVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
12.13%16.05%22.01%24.92%-16.48%27.22%13.88%30.27%-7.16%21.59%
RELVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund
10.83%18.70%12.82%18.70%-17.25%20.58%4.04%18.42%-9.80%15.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RTDYX and RELVX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.93

The correlation between RTDYX and RELVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTDYX vs. RELVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTDYX
RTDYX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
RTDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RTDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

RELVX
RELVX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
RELVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RELVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RELVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RELVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RELVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTDYX vs. RELVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTDYXRELVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

2.42

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

3.37

+0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

2.95

+0.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.35

13.13

+3.22

RTDYX vs. RELVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTDYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the RELVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTDYX and RELVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTDYXRELVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.42

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.62

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.61

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.21

+0.40

Drawdowns

RTDYX vs. RELVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTDYX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, smaller than the maximum RELVX drawdown of -66.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTDYX and RELVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTDYXRELVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.43%

-66.26%

+28.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-8.77%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.43%

-15.29%

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.43%

-25.53%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.43%

-34.08%

-3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.51%

0.00%

-3.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.29%

-17.30%

+11.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.97%

-0.19%

Volatility

RTDYX vs. RELVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) is 2.73%, while Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund (RELVX) has a volatility of 3.09%. This indicates that RTDYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RELVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTDYXRELVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

3.09%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

8.40%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.57%

10.71%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.41%

14.65%

+9.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.11%

15.19%

+6.92%

RTDYX vs. RELVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTDYX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RELVX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTDYX vs. RELVX - Dividend Comparison

RTDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.18%, more than RELVX's 9.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RELVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Equity Growth Strategy Fund
9.68%10.67%0.80%1.15%5.74%8.12%1.67%3.09%5.24%2.47%1.82%1.15%
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
31.18%35.18%31.60%4.66%6.03%6.51%3.44%6.62%11.47%7.65%1.79%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RTDYX and RELVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RELVX has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to RTDYX (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTDYX dropped -37.43% vs RELVX's -66.26%.

RTDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTDYX and RELVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer