PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTDYX vs. RALVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RTDYX vs. RALVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTDYX achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than RALVX's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RTDYX has outperformed RALVX with an annualized return of 13.91%, while RALVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.12% annualized return.


RTDYX

1D
1.54%
1M
0.42%
6M
9.25%
YTD
10.74%
1Y
21.47%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
12.08%
10Y*
13.91%
ALL TIME*
12.69%

RALVX

1D
1.44%
1M
0.23%
6M
6.14%
YTD
9.07%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
8.12%
ALL TIME*
3.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RTDYX vs. RALVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
10.74%16.05%22.01%24.92%-16.48%27.22%13.88%30.27%-7.16%21.59%
RALVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund
9.07%17.44%11.36%17.18%-16.76%17.82%6.13%15.33%-7.92%13.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RTDYX and RALVX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.93

The correlation between RTDYX and RALVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTDYX vs. RALVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RTDYX
RTDYX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RTDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RTDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RALVX
RALVX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RALVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RALVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RALVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RALVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RALVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RTDYX vs. RALVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RTDYXRALVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.14

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.94

9.29

+0.65

RTDYX vs. RALVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTDYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the RALVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTDYX and RALVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RTDYX vs. RALVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTDYX drawdown since its inception was -37.43%, smaller than the maximum RALVX drawdown of -59.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTDYX and RALVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTDYXRALVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.43%

-59.59%

+22.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.33%

-8.16%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.43%

-13.71%

-23.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.43%

-24.35%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.43%

-30.08%

-7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.70%

-0.78%

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-13.19%

+6.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.88%

+0.05%

Volatility

RTDYX vs. RALVX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund (RTDYX) has a higher volatility of 3.18% compared to Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX) at 3.00%. This indicates that RTDYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RALVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTDYXRALVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.00%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

8.78%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.33%

10.64%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.47%

13.27%

+11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.09%

13.64%

+8.45%

RTDYX vs. RALVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTDYX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than RALVX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RTDYX vs. RALVX - Dividend Comparison

RTDYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.53%, more than RALVX's 10.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RALVX
Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund
10.65%11.68%2.31%1.21%4.20%17.98%0.54%6.24%7.01%5.99%4.79%1.23%
RTDYX
Russell Investments Multifactor U.S. Equity Fund
31.53%35.18%31.60%4.66%6.03%6.51%3.44%6.62%11.47%7.65%1.79%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RTDYX and RALVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RTDYX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to RALVX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTDYX dropped -37.43% vs RALVX's -59.59%.

RALVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTDYX and RALVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer