RTAI vs. RMCA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RTAI (Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF) and RMCA (Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RTAI returned 10.41% vs 7.50% for RMCA. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RTAI charges 3.78%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for RMCA.

Performance

RTAI vs. RMCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) and Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with RTAI having a 2.45% return and RMCA slightly lower at 2.37%.

RTAI

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 10.41%
• 3Y*: 7.25%
• 5Y*: -0.79%
• 10Y*: —

RMCA

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.78%
• 1Y: 7.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTAI vs. RMCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF	2.45%	5.54%	-1.76%
RMCA Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF	2.37%	2.35%	-0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RTAI and RMCA is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024	0.57

The correlation between RTAI and RMCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RTAI vs. RMCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTAI

RTAI Risk / Return Rank: 46
RTAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RTAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
RTAI Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RTAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
RTAI Martin Ratio Rank: 43

RMCA

RMCA Risk / Return Rank: 65
RMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
RMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
RMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTAI vs. RMCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) and Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RTAI	RMCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.00	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	3.01	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.42	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.69	3.21	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.90	10.63	-3.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RTAI vs. RMCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the RMCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTAI and RMCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RTAI	RMCA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	2.00	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.48	-0.31

Drawdowns

RTAI vs. RMCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTAI drawdown since its inception was -34.32%, which is greater than RMCA's maximum drawdown of -5.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTAI and RMCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RTAI	RMCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.32%	-5.95%	-28.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.18%	-2.35%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.64%	-0.16%	-7.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.83%	-1.63%	-12.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.51%	0.71%	+0.80%

Volatility

RTAI vs. RMCA - Volatility Comparison

Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF (RTAI) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA) at 1.15%. This indicates that RTAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RTAI	RMCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.77%	1.15%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.36%	2.49%	+2.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.62%	3.76%	+2.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.34%	5.38%	+3.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.05%	5.38%	+3.67%

RTAI vs. RMCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RTAI has a 3.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RMCA's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

RTAI vs. RMCA - Dividend Comparison

RTAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than RMCA's 4.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RMCA Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF	4.36%	4.51%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RTAI Rareview Tax Advantaged Income ETF	5.05%	5.66%	5.02%	3.07%	3.71%	4.73%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RTAI and RMCA in my portfolio?

RTAI and RMCA have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RTAI or RMCA?

RTAI has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to RMCA (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTAI dropped -34.32% vs RMCA's -5.95%.

Which ETF is better, RTAI or RMCA?

On 1-year performance, RTAI leads with 10.41% vs 7.50% for RMCA. On fees, RMCA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, RMCA has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RTAI or RMCA?

Over the 1-year period, RTAI has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 7.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RTAI or RMCA?

RMCA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 3.78% for RTAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RTAI or RMCA?

RTAI has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 4.36% for RMCA.

What is the main difference between RTAI and RMCA?

They also come from different issuers: Rareview Funds and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 3.78% for RTAI and 0.55% for RMCA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.