PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSVAX vs. FLCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSVAX vs. FLCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSVAX vs. FLCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSVAX
Victory RS Value Fund
1.67%4.58%12.58%7.63%-2.98%27.30%-2.60%31.36%-10.84%17.37%
FLCGX
Meeder Quantex Fund
-3.60%19.10%36.38%14.81%-13.77%27.27%-5.36%18.48%-12.35%13.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSVAX achieves a 1.67% return, which is significantly higher than FLCGX's -3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RSVAX has underperformed FLCGX with an annualized return of 8.92%, while FLCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.79% annualized return.


RSVAX

1D
1.80%
1M
-6.09%
YTD
1.67%
6M
3.14%
1Y
7.80%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
8.92%

FLCGX

1D
2.86%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
-1.55%
1Y
17.51%
3Y*
20.98%
5Y*
10.41%
10Y*
9.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSVAX vs. FLCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSVAX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCGX's 1.62% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSVAX vs. FLCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSVAX
RSVAX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
RSVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCGX
FLCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FLCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSVAX vs. FLCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSVAXFLCGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

1.04

-0.54

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.81

1.57

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.23

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

1.55

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.97

7.23

-4.26

RSVAX vs. FLCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSVAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the FLCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSVAX and FLCGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSVAXFLCGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

1.04

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.47

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.42

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.36

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between RSVAX and FLCGX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RSVAX vs. FLCGX - Dividend Comparison

RSVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, which matches FLCGX's 8.75% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSVAX
Victory RS Value Fund
8.69%8.83%9.89%6.48%6.33%14.14%1.93%7.38%15.47%25.04%12.47%9.35%
FLCGX
Meeder Quantex Fund
8.75%8.48%39.58%1.17%2.73%16.70%0.53%0.67%0.00%2.92%2.00%17.06%

Drawdowns

RSVAX vs. FLCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSVAX drawdown since its inception was -59.23%, smaller than the maximum FLCGX drawdown of -66.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSVAX and FLCGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSVAXFLCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.23%

-66.94%

+7.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-11.76%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.58%

-32.83%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.49%

-50.45%

+6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.16%

-6.25%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.88%

-12.93%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

2.52%

+0.40%

Volatility

RSVAX vs. FLCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory RS Value Fund (RSVAX) is 4.16%, while Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that RSVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSVAXFLCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

5.71%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

9.78%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

17.47%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

22.45%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.20%

23.53%

-4.33%