PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSSY vs. FEAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSSY vs. FEAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) and Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSSY vs. FEAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RSSY
Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
15.85%-3.52%0.64%
FEAC
Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF
-4.06%18.01%-1.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSY achieves a 15.85% return, which is significantly higher than FEAC's -4.06% return.


RSSY

1D
0.96%
1M
6.68%
YTD
15.85%
6M
12.82%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FEAC

1D
2.43%
1M
-5.13%
YTD
-4.06%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
18.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSSY vs. FEAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FEAC's 0.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RSSY vs. FEAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSY
RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FEAC
FEAC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FEAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FEAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSY vs. FEAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) and Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSSYFEACDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.00

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

1.52

+0.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.55

+0.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.72

7.47

-0.75

RSSY vs. FEAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSY Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the FEAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSY and FEAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSSYFEACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.00

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.46

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between RSSY and FEAC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RSSY vs. FEAC - Dividend Comparison

RSSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than FEAC's 1.00% yield.


Drawdowns

RSSY vs. FEAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSY drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than FEAC's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSY and FEAC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSYFEACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-18.96%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.91%

-12.25%

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

-5.92%

+3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-2.78%

-5.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

2.53%

+1.79%

Volatility

RSSY vs. FEAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) is 4.21%, while Fidelity Enhanced U.S. All-Cap Equity ETF (FEAC) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that RSSY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSSYFEACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

5.05%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.95%

10.01%

+0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

18.67%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.93%

18.06%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

18.06%

+0.87%