RSSY vs. ACEP

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) and ACEP (ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSSY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ACEP.

Performance

RSSY vs. ACEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSY achieves a 33.13% return, which is significantly higher than ACEP's 22.14% return.

RSSY

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: 29.28%
• YTD: 33.13%
• 1Y: 39.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACEP

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: -0.76%
• 6M: 15.17%
• YTD: 22.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSY vs. ACEP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	33.13%	-0.87%
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF	22.14%	8.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSY and ACEP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

RSSY vs. ACEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSY

RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 94
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 93
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

ACEP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSY vs. ACEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) and ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF (ACEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSY	ACEP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.87	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.42	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.96	—	—

Drawdowns

RSSY vs. ACEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSY drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than ACEP's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSY and ACEP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSY	ACEP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-7.06%	-22.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-2.45%	+2.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-1.63%	-5.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSSY	ACEP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.12%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	17.36%	-3.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.21%	17.36%	+0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.21%	17.36%	+0.85%

RSSY vs. ACEP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than ACEP's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSY vs. ACEP - Dividend Comparison

RSSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than ACEP's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACEP ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF	0.11%	0.14%
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	1.53%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSY and ACEP in my portfolio?

RSSY and ACEP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSSY or ACEP?

On fees, ACEP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSY or ACEP?

ACEP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSY or ACEP?

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.11% for ACEP.

What is the main difference between RSSY and ACEP?

They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for RSSY and 0.45% for ACEP.