PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSSX vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSSX vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSX achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


RSSX

1D
-2.19%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
1.26%
6M
0.73%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSX vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSSX and OILK is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSSX vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSX
RSSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSX vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSSXOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

3.42

-2.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.02

6.91

-3.89

RSSX vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSX and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSSXOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

2.06

-1.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.12

+0.87

Drawdowns

RSSX vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSX drawdown since its inception was -27.37%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSX and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSXOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.37%

-83.76%

+56.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.37%

-17.35%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.42%

-3.66%

-11.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-32.61%

+25.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.49%

8.56%

+0.93%

Volatility

RSSX vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) is 7.93%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that RSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSSXOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

10.44%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.82%

23.26%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.81%

28.75%

+3.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.80%

30.12%

+1.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.80%

35.97%

-4.17%

RSSX vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSSX and OILK have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Dividends

RSSX vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

RSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%
RSSX
Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF
1.52%1.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSSX and OILK have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to RSSX (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSX dropped -27.37% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 1-year performance, OILK leads with 58.99% vs 28.58% for RSSX. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, RSSX has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OILK has performed better with a 58.99% return vs 28.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSSX and OILK have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.52% for RSSX.

RSSX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and ProShares.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSSX and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer