RSST vs. AVDV

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSST is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSST returned 39.99% vs 32.73% for AVDV. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.

Performance

RSST vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSST achieves a 17.85% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 12.46% return.

RSST

• 1D: 2.11%
• 1M: 1.29%
• 6M: 15.73%
• YTD: 17.85%
• 1Y: 39.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 20.27%

AVDV

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -2.38%
• 6M: 7.52%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 1Y: 32.73%
• 3Y*: 24.42%
• 5Y*: 14.03%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSST vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	17.85%	19.91%	18.37%	1.58%
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	12.46%	49.37%	8.67%	7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RSST and AVDV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2023	0.59

The correlation between RSST and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSST vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSST

RSST Risk / Return Rank: 71
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 67
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 75

AVDV

AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 76
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSST vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSST	AVDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	1.97	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.67	-0.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.35	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.43	2.49	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.05	9.21	+0.84

RSST vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSST Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSST and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSST vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSST drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSST and AVDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSST	AVDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.80%	-43.01%	+12.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-13.19%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.17%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	-4.39%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-6.72%	+0.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	3.56%	+0.43%

Volatility

RSST vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 4.98%. This indicates that RSST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSST	AVDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	4.98%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.98%	14.58%	+2.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.53%	16.73%	+6.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.32%	17.38%	+6.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.32%	19.72%	+4.60%

RSST vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSST vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

RSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than AVDV's 2.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	2.81%	3.05%	4.31%	3.29%	3.17%	2.39%	1.67%	0.36%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	0.95%	1.12%	0.09%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSST and AVDV in my portfolio?

RSST and AVDV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSST or AVDV?

RSST has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to AVDV (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSST dropped -30.80% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

Which ETF is better, RSST or AVDV?

On 1-year performance, RSST leads with 39.99% vs 32.73% for AVDV. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSST or AVDV?

Over the 1-year period, RSST has performed better with a 39.99% return vs 32.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSST or AVDV?

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for RSST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSST or AVDV?

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.95% for RSST.

What is the main difference between RSST and AVDV?

RSST is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Return Stacked and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for RSST and 0.36% for AVDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.