RSSL vs. RB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSSL (Global X Russell 2000 ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSSL is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSSL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.

Performance

RSSL vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSL achieves a 18.48% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.95% return.

RSSL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 18.48%
• 6M: 19.47%
• 1Y: 43.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RB

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 9.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSL vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	18.48%	15.19%
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	6.95%	10.58%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSL and RB is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.80

Return for Risk

RSSL vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSL

RSSL Risk / Return Rank: 68
RSSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
RSSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
RSSL Omega Ratio Rank: 59
RSSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RSSL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSL vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSSL	RB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.98	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSSL	RB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	3.19	-2.26

Drawdowns

RSSL vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSL drawdown since its inception was -27.79%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSL and RB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSL	RB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.79%	-1.70%	-26.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.30%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-0.41%	-5.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSSL	RB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.11%	6.21%	+12.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.46%	6.21%	+16.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	6.21%	+16.25%

RSSL vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSL vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

RSSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than RB's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	1.99%	1.78%	0.00%
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	1.27%	1.35%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSL and RB in my portfolio?

RSSL and RB have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSSL or RB?

On fees, RSSL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSL or RB?

RSSL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSL or RB?

RB has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.27% for RSSL.

What is the main difference between RSSL and RB?

RSSL is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. RSSL tracks Russell 2000 RIC Capped Index, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: Global X and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for RSSL and 0.58% for RB.