RSSL vs. CVSM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RSSL (Global X Russell 2000 ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. RSSL is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSSL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.

Performance

RSSL vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RSSL

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -2.19%
• 6M: 12.69%
• YTD: 18.67%
• 1Y: 36.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.84%

CVSM

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	$48.53K	$49.87K	$42.10K
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	$577.43K	$3.15M	$2.35M

RSSL vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	5.18%
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	4.43%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSL and CVSM is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026	0.58

Return for Risk

RSSL vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSSL

RSSL Risk / Return Rank: 78
RSSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RSSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
RSSL Omega Ratio Rank: 70
RSSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RSSL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

CVSM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSSL vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSL	CVSM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.08	—	—

Drawdowns

RSSL vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSL drawdown since its inception was -27.79%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSL and CVSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSL	CVSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.79%	-3.36%	-24.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.07%	-2.33%	-0.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-0.96%	-4.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RSSL	CVSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.37%	11.65%	+7.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.12%	11.65%	+10.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.12%	11.65%	+10.47%

RSSL vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSSL vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison

RSSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF	0.23%	0.00%	0.00%
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF	1.24%	1.35%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSL and CVSM in my portfolio?

RSSL and CVSM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RSSL or CVSM?

On fees, RSSL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSL or CVSM?

RSSL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSL or CVSM?

RSSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.

What is the main difference between RSSL and CVSM?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for RSSL and 0.55% for CVSM.