RSSL vs. CVSM
RSSL (Global X Russell 2000 ETF) and CVSM (CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. RSSL is passively managed, while CVSM is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSSL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for CVSM.
Performance
RSSL vs. CVSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RSSL
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 12.80%
- YTD
- 19.70%
- 1Y
- 33.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSM
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSL vs. CVSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | 6.09% |
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 3.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSSL and CVSM is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSSL vs. CVSM — Risk / Return Rank
RSSL
CVSM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSSL vs. CVSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) and CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSSL | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSSL vs. CVSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSSL drawdown since its inception was -27.79%, which is greater than CVSM's maximum drawdown of -3.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSL and CVSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSSL | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.79% | -3.36% | -24.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -1.46% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.46% | -1.01% | -4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | — | — |
Volatility
RSSL vs. CVSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSSL | CVSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.05% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 11.19% | +8.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 11.19% | +11.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 11.19% | +11.10% |
RSSL vs. CVSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSSL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than CVSM's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSSL vs. CVSM - Dividend Comparison
RSSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than CVSM's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CVSM CresAlta Small & Mid-Cap ETF | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSSL Global X Russell 2000 ETF | 1.23% | 1.35% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSSL and CVSM have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSSL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSSL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for CVSM.
RSSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.23% for CVSM.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and CresAlta. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for RSSL and 0.55% for CVSM.
Find the right allocation for RSSL and CVSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer