RSSE vs. UXJA

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

RSSE (FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September) and UXJA (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSSE returned 14.40% vs 24.80% for UXJA. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.

Performance

RSSE vs. UXJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSE achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than UXJA's 14.32% return.

RSSE

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.40%
• 6M: 7.93%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 1Y: 14.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.51%

UXJA

• 1D: 2.20%
• 1M: 4.00%
• 6M: 12.94%
• YTD: 14.32%
• 1Y: 24.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSSE FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September	$87.23K	$92.56K	$78.59K
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	$38.72K	$57.90K	$74.79K

RSSE vs. UXJA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RSSE FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September	10.21%	5.86%
UXJA FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January	14.32%	14.47%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSE and UXJA is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2025	0.75

The correlation between RSSE and UXJA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RSSE vs. UXJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSSE

RSSE Risk / Return Rank: 79
RSSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RSSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
RSSE Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RSSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
RSSE Martin Ratio Rank: 83

UXJA

UXJA Risk / Return Rank: 64
UXJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
UXJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
UXJA Omega Ratio Rank: 60
UXJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
UXJA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSSE vs. UXJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSSE	UXJA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	1.71	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.36	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	2.53	+0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	9.99	+2.59

RSSE vs. UXJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the UXJA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSE and UXJA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSSE vs. UXJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSE drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum UXJA drawdown of -20.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSE and UXJA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSSE	UXJA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-20.01%	+8.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.38%	-9.83%	+5.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-2.89%	+1.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	2.49%	-1.34%

Volatility

RSSE vs. UXJA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - September (RSSE) is 1.42%, while FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - January (UXJA) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that RSSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSSE	UXJA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.42%	4.69%	-3.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.01%	11.39%	-6.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.57%	14.65%	-7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.92%	18.42%	-8.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.92%	18.42%	-8.50%

RSSE vs. UXJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSSE and UXJA have an expense ratio of 0.85%.

Dividends

RSSE vs. UXJA - Dividend Comparison

Neither RSSE nor UXJA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSSE and UXJA in my portfolio?

RSSE and UXJA have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSSE or UXJA?

UXJA has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to RSSE (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSE dropped -11.37% vs UXJA's -20.01%.

Which ETF is better, RSSE or UXJA?

On 1-year performance, UXJA leads with 24.80% vs 14.40% for RSSE. Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. On volatility, RSSE has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSSE or UXJA?

Over the 1-year period, UXJA has performed better with a 24.80% return vs 14.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSSE or UXJA?

RSSE and UXJA have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSSE or UXJA?

RSSE and UXJA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.