PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSSB vs. RSSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSSB vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSSB achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.


RSSB

1D
-1.22%
1M
4.37%
YTD
9.57%
6M
9.59%
1Y
27.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSSY

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.78%
YTD
32.45%
6M
27.13%
1Y
47.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSSB vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RSSB
Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF
9.57%25.16%7.59%
RSSY
Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
32.45%-3.52%1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RSSB and RSSY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024

0.52

The correlation between RSSB and RSSY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSSB vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSSB
RSSB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RSSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSB Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

RSSY
RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSSB vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSSBRSSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.65

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

6.53

-4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

22.39

-12.53

RSSB vs. RSSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is lower than the RSSY Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSSB and RSSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSSBRSSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

3.63

-1.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

0.75

+0.55

Drawdowns

RSSB vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSSB drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSSB and RSSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSSBRSSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.21%

-29.57%

+13.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-7.36%

-4.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.16%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-7.37%

+5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.14%

+0.70%

Volatility

RSSB vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF (RSSB) has a higher volatility of 4.95% compared to Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) at 2.30%. This indicates that RSSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSSBRSSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.95%

2.30%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.64%

9.92%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

13.28%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.35%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

18.35%

-1.76%

RSSB vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSSB has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSSB vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

RSSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than RSSY's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
RSSB
Return Stacked Global Stocks & Bonds ETF
3.18%3.48%1.10%0.61%
RSSY
Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF
1.54%2.04%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSSB and RSSY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSSB has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to RSSY (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSSB dropped -16.21% vs RSSY's -29.57%.

On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 27.89% for RSSB. On fees, RSSB is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, RSSY has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 27.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSSB is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 1.54% for RSSY.

RSSB is categorized as Global Allocation, while RSSY is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for RSSB and 1.04% for RSSY.

RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSSB and RSSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer