PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 6.94% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -27.99% return.


RSPU

1D
1.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
6.94%
6M
7.66%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
9.57%

PLTR

1D
-2.36%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
-27.99%
6M
-30.28%
1Y
-6.85%
3Y*
99.99%
5Y*
39.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
6.94%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%7.85%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-27.99%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%135.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and PLTR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020

0.07

The correlation between RSPU and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPUPLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.03

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

-0.14

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

-0.25

+4.02

RSPU vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is higher than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-84.62%

+36.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-38.22%

+29.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-40.61%

+24.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-79.14%

+57.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-38.22%

+32.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-40.27%

+32.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.75%

21.23%

-17.48%

Volatility

RSPU vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is 5.41%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that RSPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.41%

17.16%

-11.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

38.32%

-27.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

50.83%

-36.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

65.44%

-48.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.10%

69.75%

-50.65%

Dividends

RSPU vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, while PLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.49%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and PLTR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (17.16%) compared to RSPU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

RSPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer