PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPU has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 9.39%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


RSPU

1D
-0.25%
1M
-4.29%
YTD
4.83%
6M
3.78%
1Y
10.96%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
9.39%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPU vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
4.83%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%17.13%-2.70%22.94%6.89%9.43%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and IVV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPU and IVV has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSPU vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPU
IVV

Utilities

100.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

RSPU
100.0%
IVV
2.4%

Basic Materials

RSPU

-

IVV
1.8%

Communication Services

RSPU

-

IVV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPU

-

IVV
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

RSPU

-

IVV
4.9%

Energy

RSPU

-

IVV
3.5%

Financial Services

RSPU

-

IVV
11.8%

Healthcare

RSPU

-

IVV
8.5%

Industrials

RSPU

-

IVV
8.3%

Real Estate

RSPU

-

IVV
1.9%

Technology

RSPU

-

IVV
35.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPU vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPUIVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

2.39

-1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

3.25

-2.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

3.17

-1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.04

14.71

-11.66

RSPU vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPUIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

2.39

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.83

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.86

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.45

+0.01

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-55.25%

+7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-8.89%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.27%

-18.75%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

-24.53%

+2.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

-33.90%

-2.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-0.76%

-6.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-10.78%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

1.91%

+1.72%

Volatility

RSPU vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that RSPU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.21%

2.87%

+2.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

8.90%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.98%

11.80%

+2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.88%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.09%

18.05%

+1.04%

RSPU vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPU vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.54%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and IVV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPU has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 9.39% for RSPU. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer