PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPU vs. FCLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPU vs. FCLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPU achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than FCLD's 33.66% return.


RSPU

1D
-0.78%
1M
-3.70%
6M
4.75%
YTD
6.90%
1Y
7.59%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
9.27%
ALL TIME*
8.99%

FCLD

1D
1.33%
1M
4.17%
6M
35.89%
YTD
33.66%
1Y
45.67%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$599.13K$567.95K$795.73K
$2.36M$2.33M$3.07M

RSPU vs. FCLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
6.90%16.82%23.57%-3.45%4.37%9.10%
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
33.66%8.19%21.80%53.05%-41.32%-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPU and FCLD is -0.17, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021

0.15

The correlation between RSPU and FCLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPU vs. FCLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPU
RSPU Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
RSPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPU Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FCLD
FCLD Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FCLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FCLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPU vs. FCLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) and Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPUFCLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.23

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

2.28

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.06

5.48

-3.42

RSPU vs. FCLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPU Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the FCLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPU and FCLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPU vs. FCLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPU drawdown since its inception was -48.08%, smaller than the maximum FCLD drawdown of -50.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPU and FCLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPUFCLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.08%

-50.85%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.46%

-17.48%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.77%

-34.80%

+23.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-4.65%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-20.08%

+12.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

7.31%

-3.38%

Volatility

RSPU vs. FCLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) is 4.67%, while Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF (FCLD) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that RSPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPUFCLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

6.98%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

22.27%

-10.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.48%

28.80%

-14.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.93%

30.39%

-13.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

30.39%

-11.25%

RSPU vs. FCLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPU has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FCLD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPU vs. FCLD - Dividend Comparison

RSPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, more than FCLD's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCLD
Fidelity Cloud Computing ETF
0.01%0.03%0.13%0.17%0.26%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPU
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
2.57%2.54%2.39%2.92%2.35%2.41%2.94%2.54%3.11%3.08%2.98%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPU and FCLD have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCLD has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to RSPU (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPU dropped -48.08% vs FCLD's -50.85%.

On 3-year performance, FCLD leads with 24.29% vs 15.03% for RSPU. On fees, FCLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 4.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FCLD has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 15.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.

RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.01% for FCLD.

RSPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while FCLD is Technology Equities. RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus, while FCLD tracks Fidelity Cloud Computing Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPU and 0.39% for FCLD.

FCLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPU and FCLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer