RSPT vs. XT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - RSPT tracks the S&P 500® Information Technology Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPT returned 20.69%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.

Performance

RSPT vs. XT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 34.90% return, which is significantly higher than XT's 15.68% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed XT with an annualized return of 20.69%, while XT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.72% annualized return.

RSPT

• 1D: 1.46%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 28.39%
• YTD: 34.90%
• 1Y: 50.97%
• 3Y*: 28.61%
• 5Y*: 15.94%
• 10Y*: 20.69%
• ALL TIME*: 14.53%

XT

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -2.33%
• 6M: 11.05%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 1Y: 33.19%
• 3Y*: 16.27%
• 5Y*: 6.52%
• 10Y*: 13.72%
• ALL TIME*: 12.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	$34.86M	$46.20M	$44.03M
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	$6.36M	$6.26M	$10.28M

RSPT vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	34.90%	22.15%	15.16%	35.18%	-24.50%	28.53%	30.21%	42.07%	-0.61%	32.98%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	15.68%	26.28%	0.29%	27.02%	-27.83%	16.43%	35.10%	30.74%	-4.93%	33.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and XT is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015	0.91

The correlation between RSPT and XT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPT	XT
Technology	98.7%	42.9%
Communication Services	1.3%	4.0%
Energy	1.3%	0.1%
Industrials	0.8%	8.0%
Financial Services	0.0%	3.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	28.5%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Utilities	-	4.9%

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 82
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 76
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

XT

XT Risk / Return Rank: 79
XT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
XT Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
XT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPT vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RSPT	XT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.87	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	2.54	+0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	3.19	+0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.13	11.45	-0.32

RSPT vs. XT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the XT Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and XT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and XT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	XT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-34.41%	-24.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.29%	-10.45%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	-22.09%	-4.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	-34.41%	+1.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	-34.41%	+0.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.11%	-4.22%	-4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-7.35%	-1.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.59%	2.90%	+1.69%

Volatility

RSPT vs. XT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 5.03%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	XT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.66%	5.03%	+1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.51%	14.41%	+6.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.91%	17.83%	+7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.74%	21.09%	+3.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	20.13%	+3.88%

RSPT vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPT vs. XT - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than XT's 7.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.27%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF	7.08%	7.95%	0.66%	0.41%	0.78%	0.84%	0.77%	1.55%	1.40%	0.97%	1.37%	1.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPT and XT in my portfolio?

RSPT and XT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPT or XT?

RSPT has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to XT (5.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs XT's -34.41%.

Which ETF is better, RSPT or XT?

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 20.69% vs 13.72% for XT. On fees, RSPT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 5.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPT or XT?

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 20.69% return vs 13.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPT or XT?

RSPT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPT or XT?

XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.27% for RSPT.

What is the main difference between RSPT and XT?

RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.46% for XT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.