RSPT vs. SOXQ
RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, RSPT returned 33.71%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
RSPT vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
RSPT
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 22.88%
- YTD
- 47.30%
- 6M
- 46.37%
- 1Y
- 75.62%
- 3Y*
- 33.71%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.48%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPT vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 47.30% | 22.15% | 15.16% | 35.18% | -24.50% | 14.13% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPT and SOXQ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between RSPT and SOXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPT vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPT
SOXQ
Technology
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
RSPT
SOXQ
Energy
RSPT
SOXQ
-
Industrials
RSPT
SOXQ
-
Financial Services
RSPT
SOXQ
Basic Materials
RSPT
-
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
RSPT
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPT
-
SOXQ
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPT
-
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
RSPT
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
RSPT
-
SOXQ
-
Utilities
RSPT
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPT vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
RSPT
SOXQ
RSPT vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPT | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.72 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.12 | 11.73 | -4.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.76 | 45.01 | -19.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPT | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54 | 5.43 | -1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.98 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
RSPT vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPT | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.91% | -46.01% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -15.59% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | -39.36% | +12.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | 0.00% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.90% | -12.96% | +4.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 4.06% | -1.11% |
Volatility
RSPT vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is 7.02%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that RSPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPT | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.02% | 13.44% | -6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 26.70% | -9.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.55% | 33.78% | -12.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.08% | 36.38% | -12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.77% | 36.38% | -12.61% |
RSPT vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPT vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 0.25% | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.56% | 0.71% | 0.50% | 1.29% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 1.16% | 1.18% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPT and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to RSPT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 33.71% for RSPT. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, RSPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 33.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.
RSPT and SOXQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.25%.
RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 3.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPT and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer