PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 34.90% return, which is significantly higher than QQQE's 16.27% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed QQQE with an annualized return of 20.69%, while QQQE has yielded a comparatively lower 14.69% annualized return.


RSPT

1D
1.46%
1M
-0.11%
6M
28.39%
YTD
34.90%
1Y
50.97%
3Y*
28.61%
5Y*
15.94%
10Y*
20.69%
ALL TIME*
14.53%

QQQE

1D
1.29%
1M
-1.31%
6M
13.79%
YTD
16.27%
1Y
23.25%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
14.69%
ALL TIME*
14.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.47M$22.17M$24.25M
$34.86M$46.20M$44.03M

RSPT vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
34.90%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
16.27%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and QQQE is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2012

0.91

The correlation between RSPT and QQQE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPT
QQQE

Technology

98.7%
44.3%

Communication Services

1.3%
9.6%

Energy

1.3%
1.8%

Industrials

0.8%
10.8%

Financial Services

0.0%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.0%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

3.9%

Technology

RSPT
98.7%
QQQE
44.3%

Communication Services

RSPT
1.3%
QQQE
9.6%

Energy

RSPT
1.3%
QQQE
1.8%

Industrials

RSPT
0.8%
QQQE
10.8%

Financial Services

RSPT
0.0%
QQQE
1.0%

Basic Materials

RSPT

-

QQQE
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPT

-

QQQE
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

RSPT

-

QQQE
8.0%

Healthcare

RSPT

-

QQQE
8.8%

Real Estate

RSPT

-

QQQE
0.7%

Utilities

RSPT

-

QQQE
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPT vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPTQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

2.48

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

7.91

+3.22

RSPT vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-32.14%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-9.41%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-21.38%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-32.14%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-32.14%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.11%

-3.22%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-5.14%

-3.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

2.94%

+1.65%

Volatility

RSPT vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 3.89%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

3.89%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

12.92%

+7.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

15.92%

+8.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.74%

20.59%

+4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.01%

20.76%

+3.25%

RSPT vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPT vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than QQQE's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.57%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.27%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, RSPT and QQQE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RSPT has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to QQQE (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 20.69% vs 14.69% for QQQE. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 20.69% return vs 14.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.27% for RSPT.

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.35% for QQQE.

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer