PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly higher than QQQE's 19.12% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPT has outperformed QQQE with an annualized return of 22.48%, while QQQE has yielded a comparatively lower 15.49% annualized return.


RSPT

1D
-0.76%
1M
22.88%
YTD
47.30%
6M
46.37%
1Y
75.62%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
22.48%

QQQE

1D
-0.10%
1M
10.46%
YTD
19.12%
6M
17.48%
1Y
28.68%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
47.30%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
19.12%14.58%6.98%33.76%-24.47%17.93%37.85%36.43%-5.40%26.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and QQQE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2012

0.91

The correlation between RSPT and QQQE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPT
QQQE

Technology

97.6%
45.1%

Energy

1.4%
2.0%

Industrials

1.0%
10.1%

Financial Services

0.1%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

3.9%

Technology

RSPT
97.6%
QQQE
45.1%

Energy

RSPT
1.4%
QQQE
2.0%

Industrials

RSPT
1.0%
QQQE
10.1%

Financial Services

RSPT
0.1%
QQQE
1.0%

Basic Materials

RSPT

-

QQQE
0.9%

Communication Services

RSPT

-

QQQE
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPT

-

QQQE
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

RSPT

-

QQQE
7.7%

Healthcare

RSPT

-

QQQE
8.6%

Real Estate

RSPT

-

QQQE
0.7%

Utilities

RSPT

-

QQQE
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPTQQQEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.35

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.12

3.06

+4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.76

10.57

+15.19

RSPT vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPTQQQEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

2.04

+1.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.51

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.75

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.76

-0.11

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-32.14%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-9.41%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-21.38%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-32.14%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-32.14%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.10%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-5.17%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.72%

+0.23%

Volatility

RSPT vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) has a higher volatility of 7.02% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 3.79%. This indicates that RSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

3.79%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

10.64%

+6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

14.15%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

20.30%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

20.72%

+3.05%

RSPT vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPT vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than QQQE's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.52%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.25%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, RSPT and QQQE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RSPT has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to QQQE (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 10-year performance, RSPT leads with 22.48% vs 15.49% for QQQE. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPT has performed better with a 22.48% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

QQQE has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.25% for RSPT.

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.35% for QQQE.

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer