PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. FTXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.


RSPT

1D
-0.76%
1M
22.88%
YTD
47.30%
6M
46.37%
1Y
75.62%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
19.46%
10Y*
22.48%

FTXL

1D
2.21%
1M
30.59%
YTD
115.70%
6M
113.17%
1Y
225.15%
3Y*
61.52%
5Y*
34.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
47.30%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
115.70%48.94%7.59%54.41%-33.88%36.04%46.08%61.77%-14.47%32.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and FTXL is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016

0.88

The correlation between RSPT and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPT
FTXL

Technology

97.6%
99.5%

Energy

1.4%

-

Industrials

1.0%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RSPT
97.6%
FTXL
99.5%

Energy

RSPT
1.4%
FTXL

-

Industrials

RSPT
1.0%
FTXL
0.5%

Financial Services

RSPT
0.1%
FTXL

-

Basic Materials

RSPT

-

FTXL

-

Communication Services

RSPT

-

FTXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPT

-

FTXL

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPT

-

FTXL

-

Healthcare

RSPT

-

FTXL

-

Real Estate

RSPT

-

FTXL

-

Utilities

RSPT

-

FTXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

FTXL
FTXL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FTXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTXL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
FTXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTXL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPTFTXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.78

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.12

15.62

-8.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.76

58.28

-32.53

RSPT vs. FTXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is lower than the FTXL Sharpe Ratio of 6.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and FTXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPTFTXLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

6.33

-2.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.97

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.94

-0.28

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than FTXL's maximum drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and FTXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTFTXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-43.87%

-15.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-14.51%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-41.57%

+14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-43.87%

+11.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

0.00%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-10.56%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.88%

-0.93%

Volatility

RSPT vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is 7.02%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that RSPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTFTXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

14.28%

-7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

28.98%

-11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.55%

35.94%

-14.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.08%

36.02%

-11.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.77%

34.25%

-10.48%

RSPT vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPT vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTXL
First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF
0.12%0.28%0.54%0.60%0.89%0.25%0.48%0.92%0.71%0.47%0.12%0.00%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.25%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPT and FTXL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to RSPT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs FTXL's -43.87%.

On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 19.46% for RSPT. On fees, RSPT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 19.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXL.

RSPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.60% for FTXL.

FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 3.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and FTXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer