RSPT vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) and AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. RSPT is passively managed, while AIS is actively managed. Over the past year, RSPT returned 75.62% vs 226.72% for AIS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIS.

Performance

RSPT vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 47.30% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 118.61% return.

RSPT

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 22.88%
• YTD: 47.30%
• 6M: 46.37%
• 1Y: 75.62%
• 3Y*: 33.71%
• 5Y*: 19.46%
• 10Y*: 22.48%

AIS

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 35.87%
• YTD: 118.61%
• 6M: 122.65%
• 1Y: 226.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPT vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	47.30%	22.15%	-4.13%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	118.61%	58.35%	-4.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and AIS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.86

The correlation between RSPT and AIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. AIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RSPT	AIS
Technology	97.6%	84.6%
Energy	1.4%	-
Industrials	1.0%	8.9%
Financial Services	0.1%	-0.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	3.2%

Return for Risk

RSPT vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPT

RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 91
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 97
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 96
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPT vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPT	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.54	6.34	-2.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.27	5.78	-1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.80	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.12	14.41	-7.28
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	25.76	47.43	-21.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPT vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPT	AIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.54	6.34	-2.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	3.24	-2.59

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, which is greater than AIS's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPT	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.91%	-32.78%	-26.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-15.84%	+5.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	0.00%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.90%	-5.45%	-3.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	4.80%	-1.85%

Volatility

RSPT vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is 7.02%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that RSPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPT	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.02%	16.12%	-9.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.12%	29.95%	-12.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.55%	36.00%	-14.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.08%	38.04%	-13.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.77%	38.04%	-14.27%

RSPT vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPT vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF	0.25%	0.39%	0.44%	0.56%	0.71%	0.50%	1.29%	0.92%	0.98%	0.84%	1.16%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSPT and AIS in my portfolio?

RSPT and AIS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSPT or AIS?

AIS has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to RSPT (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs AIS's -32.78%.

Which ETF is better, RSPT or AIS?

On 1-year performance, AIS leads with 226.72% vs 75.62% for RSPT. On fees, RSPT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSPT or AIS?

Over the 1-year period, AIS has performed better with a 226.72% return vs 75.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSPT or AIS?

RSPT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSPT or AIS?

RSPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.25%, compared with 0.00% for AIS.

What is the main difference between RSPT and AIS?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.75% for AIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.34 vs 3.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.