RSPR vs. SRET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET).

RSPR and SRET are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPR is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC. It was launched on Aug 12, 2015. SRET is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global SuperDividend REIT Index. It was launched on Mar 17, 2015. Both RSPR and SRET are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RSPR vs. SRET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSPR vs. SRET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF	-0.36%	-1.88%	8.61%	11.59%	-25.16%	49.61%	-2.90%	24.62%	-4.11%	8.76%
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF	-1.33%	18.09%	-1.55%	9.85%	-18.24%	14.00%	-36.63%	22.77%	-5.52%	17.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than SRET's -1.33% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPR has outperformed SRET with an annualized return of 5.36%, while SRET has yielded a comparatively lower 1.15% annualized return.

RSPR

• 1D: 1.38%
• 1M: -6.13%
• YTD: -0.36%
• 6M: -4.86%
• 1Y: -4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.81%
• 5Y*: 2.97%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

SRET

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -6.86%
• YTD: -1.33%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 8.44%
• 3Y*: 7.46%
• 5Y*: 1.30%
• 10Y*: 1.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPR vs. SRET - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SRET's 0.58% expense ratio.

SRET

Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF

RSPR

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF

Return for Risk

RSPR vs. SRET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR

RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 7
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SRET

SRET Risk / Return Rank: 34
SRET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SRET Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SRET Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SRET Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
SRET Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. SRET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPR	SRET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	0.60	-0.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.24	0.87	-1.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.12	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.29	0.82	-1.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.83	3.45	-4.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPR vs. SRET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the SRET Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and SRET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPR	SRET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	0.60	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.08	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	0.05	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.04	+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and SRET is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RSPR vs. SRET - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than SRET's 8.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF	2.90%	2.70%	2.58%	2.91%	3.14%	2.56%	3.82%	2.48%	3.02%	3.01%	2.06%	1.03%
SRET Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF	8.24%	7.98%	8.72%	7.21%	8.30%	6.33%	8.88%	7.83%	8.54%	8.20%	8.08%	7.74%

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. SRET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum SRET drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and SRET.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPR	SRET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.96%	-66.98%	+25.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-11.38%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.03%	-30.56%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.96%	-66.98%	+25.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.51%	-27.93%	+16.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.47%	-22.47%	+13.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	2.72%	+1.67%

Volatility

RSPR vs. SRET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 4.86%, while Global X SuperDividend REIT ETF (SRET) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPR	SRET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.86%	5.49%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.96%	8.35%	+1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.19%	14.10%	+3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.11%	16.54%	+2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.38%	24.60%	-3.22%