PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPR vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPR vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPR has underperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 6.30%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.55% annualized return.


RSPR

1D
1.27%
1M
1.57%
YTD
10.68%
6M
11.84%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
6.30%

SPHD

1D
1.63%
1M
0.82%
YTD
8.20%
6M
8.56%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
12.70%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
7.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPR vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
10.68%-1.88%8.61%11.59%-25.16%49.61%-2.90%24.62%-4.11%8.76%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
8.20%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%-9.98%20.26%-6.17%11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPR and SPHD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2015

0.71

The correlation between RSPR and SPHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPR vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPR
RSPR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
RSPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPR vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPRSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.18

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

1.66

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

4.06

-2.41

RSPR vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPR Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPR and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPR vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPRSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.96%

-41.39%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.71%

-7.33%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-13.29%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.03%

-19.50%

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.96%

-41.39%

-0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

-1.91%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-4.69%

-4.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

2.98%

+0.97%

Volatility

RSPR vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 4.26%. This indicates that RSPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPRSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

4.26%

+0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

8.13%

+2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.59%

11.48%

+3.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.13%

14.16%

+4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

17.65%

+3.77%

RSPR vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPR vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than SPHD's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPR
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF
2.84%2.70%2.58%2.91%3.14%2.56%3.82%2.48%3.02%3.01%2.06%1.03%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.60%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPR and SPHD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPR has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to SPHD (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 10-year performance, SPHD leads with 7.55% vs 6.30% for RSPR. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 7.55% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPR.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.84% for RSPR.

RSPR is categorized as REIT, while SPHD is Dividend. RSPR tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPR and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer