RSPR vs. PDBC
RSPR (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPR is a REIT fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Real Estate - SEC, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. RSPR is passively managed, while PDBC is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RSPR returned 5.63%/yr vs 9.21%/yr for PDBC. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RSPR charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
RSPR vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPR achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 32.53% return. Over the past 10 years, RSPR has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 5.63%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 9.21% annualized return.
RSPR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 1Y
- 10.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.39%
- 10Y*
- 5.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.62%
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 20.94%
- YTD
- 32.53%
- 1Y
- 38.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $92.97M | $139.65M | $120.69M | |
| $510.77K | $450.22K | $625.86K |
RSPR vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 12.19% | -1.88% | 8.61% | 11.59% | -25.16% | 49.61% | -2.90% | 24.62% | -4.11% | 8.76% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 32.53% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPR and PDBC is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2015 | 0.09 |
The correlation between RSPR and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.10 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPR vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
RSPR
PDBC
RSPR vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.32 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 2.21 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 7.40 | -4.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPR vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPR drawdown since its inception was -41.96%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPR and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.96% | -49.52% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -16.55% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.78% | -16.55% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.03% | -27.63% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.96% | -40.73% | -1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.06% | -7.14% | +5.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -23.03% | +13.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 4.98% | -1.55% |
Volatility
RSPR vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF (RSPR) is 4.39%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that RSPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPR | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.39% | 7.00% | -2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 17.41% | -6.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.61% | 19.62% | -5.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.15% | 19.27% | -0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.40% | 17.83% | +3.57% |
RSPR vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPR has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPR vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
RSPR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than PDBC's 2.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.90% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
RSPR Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Real Estate ETF | 2.80% | 2.70% | 2.58% | 2.91% | 3.14% | 2.56% | 3.82% | 2.48% | 3.02% | 3.01% | 2.06% | 1.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPR and PDBC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to RSPR (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPR dropped -41.96% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
On 10-year performance, PDBC leads with 9.21% vs 5.63% for RSPR. On fees, RSPR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPR has been the lower-risk option at 4.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 9.21% return vs 5.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.80% for RSPR.
RSPR is categorized as REIT, while PDBC is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPR and 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPR and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer