PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPH vs. IHE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPH vs. IHE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPH achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly lower than IHE's 6.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPH having a 7.94% annualized return and IHE not far behind at 7.81%.


RSPH

1D
0.81%
1M
2.49%
YTD
-2.71%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
8.70%
3Y*
3.21%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
7.94%

IHE

1D
1.16%
1M
1.80%
YTD
6.47%
6M
8.51%
1Y
40.15%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPH vs. IHE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
-2.71%9.52%-0.94%3.95%-9.40%23.19%18.83%25.48%-0.66%23.70%
IHE
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF
6.47%31.69%8.13%1.06%-4.87%13.07%13.66%15.47%-7.76%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPH and IHE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006

0.81

The correlation between RSPH and IHE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPH vs. IHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPH
IHE

Healthcare

98.5%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

RSPH
98.5%
IHE
100.0%

Financial Services

RSPH
0.1%
IHE

-

Basic Materials

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Communication Services

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Energy

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Industrials

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Real Estate

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Technology

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Utilities

RSPH

-

IHE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPH vs. IHE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPH
RSPH Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RSPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPH Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPH Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IHE
IHE Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
IHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPH vs. IHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) and iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPHIHEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.40

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

4.76

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

14.35

-12.34

RSPH vs. IHE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPH Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the IHE Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPH and IHE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPHIHEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

2.36

-1.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.62

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.43

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.51

+0.07

Drawdowns

RSPH vs. IHE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPH drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than IHE's maximum drawdown of -38.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPH and IHE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPHIHEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.49%

-38.20%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-8.47%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.13%

-15.92%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.95%

-16.03%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.44%

-29.59%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.83%

-2.80%

-4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-7.92%

+1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

2.81%

+1.52%

Volatility

RSPH vs. IHE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) is 3.87%, while iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF (IHE) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that RSPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPHIHEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

5.53%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.36%

12.48%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.46%

17.07%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

16.24%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.72%

18.05%

-0.33%

RSPH vs. IHE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPH has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IHE's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPH vs. IHE - Dividend Comparison

RSPH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than IHE's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHE
iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF
1.65%1.76%1.73%1.39%2.01%1.49%1.19%1.40%1.25%1.36%0.92%1.93%
RSPH
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
0.73%0.70%0.71%0.66%0.64%0.50%0.51%0.54%0.53%0.47%0.48%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPH and IHE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IHE has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to RSPH (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPH dropped -40.49% vs IHE's -38.20%.

On 10-year performance, RSPH leads with 7.94% vs 7.81% for IHE. On fees, RSPH is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPH has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RSPH has performed better with a 7.94% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPH is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IHE.

IHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.73% for RSPH.

RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC, while IHE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Pharmaceuticals Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPH and 0.42% for IHE.

IHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPH and IHE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer