PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPF vs. TFNS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPF vs. TFNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPF achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly higher than TFNS's -3.01% return.


RSPF

1D
2.57%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-2.82%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
17.19%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
11.59%

TFNS

1D
2.48%
1M
1.06%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
0.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPF vs. TFNS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSPF and TFNS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.93

RSPF vs. TFNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPF
TFNS

Financial Services

92.7%
97.1%

Technology

6.1%
1.9%

Industrials

1.2%
0.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

RSPF
92.7%
TFNS
97.1%

Technology

RSPF
6.1%
TFNS
1.9%

Industrials

RSPF
1.2%
TFNS
0.9%

Basic Materials

RSPF

-

TFNS

-

Communication Services

RSPF

-

TFNS

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPF

-

TFNS

-

Consumer Defensive

RSPF

-

TFNS

-

Energy

RSPF

-

TFNS

-

Healthcare

RSPF

-

TFNS

-

Real Estate

RSPF

-

TFNS

-

Utilities

RSPF

-

TFNS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPF vs. TFNS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPF
RSPF Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
RSPF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPF Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPF Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TFNS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPF vs. TFNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPFTFNSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.10

RSPF vs. TFNS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPFTFNSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.48

-0.27

Drawdowns

RSPF vs. TFNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than TFNS's maximum drawdown of -14.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and TFNS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPFTFNSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.32%

-14.00%

-67.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-5.72%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.04%

-3.83%

-15.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

Volatility

RSPF vs. TFNS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPFTFNSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.26%

15.22%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

15.22%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.92%

15.22%

+7.70%

RSPF vs. TFNS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TFNS's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPF vs. TFNS - Dividend Comparison

RSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than TFNS's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPF
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
1.66%1.55%1.65%2.16%1.95%1.56%2.24%1.85%2.51%1.28%37.55%2.17%
TFNS
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF
0.51%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, RSPF and TFNS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, RSPF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RSPF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.

RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.51% for TFNS.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPF and 0.44% for TFNS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPF and TFNS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer