RSPF vs. TFNS
RSPF (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF) and TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. RSPF is passively managed, while TFNS is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RSPF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TFNS.
Performance
RSPF vs. TFNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPF achieves a -2.82% return, which is significantly higher than TFNS's -3.01% return.
RSPF
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -2.82%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
TFNS
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- -3.01%
- 6M
- 0.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPF vs. TFNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF | -2.82% | 8.14% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | -3.01% | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPF and TFNS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.93 |
RSPF vs. TFNS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPF
TFNS
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
RSPF
TFNS
Technology
RSPF
TFNS
Industrials
RSPF
TFNS
Basic Materials
RSPF
-
TFNS
-
Communication Services
RSPF
-
TFNS
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPF
-
TFNS
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPF
-
TFNS
-
Energy
RSPF
-
TFNS
-
Healthcare
RSPF
-
TFNS
-
Real Estate
RSPF
-
TFNS
-
Utilities
RSPF
-
TFNS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPF vs. TFNS — Risk / Return Rank
RSPF
TFNS
RSPF vs. TFNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF (RSPF) and T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPF | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.10 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPF | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.48 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
RSPF vs. TFNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPF drawdown since its inception was -81.32%, which is greater than TFNS's maximum drawdown of -14.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPF and TFNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPF | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.32% | -14.00% | -67.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -5.72% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.04% | -3.83% | -15.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.06% | — | — |
Volatility
RSPF vs. TFNS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPF | TFNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 15.22% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 15.22% | +4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 15.22% | +7.70% |
RSPF vs. TFNS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TFNS's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPF vs. TFNS - Dividend Comparison
RSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than TFNS's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPF Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.65% | 2.16% | 1.95% | 1.56% | 2.24% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 1.28% | 37.55% | 2.17% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | 0.51% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, RSPF and TFNS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, RSPF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSPF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for TFNS.
RSPF has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.51% for TFNS.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPF and 0.44% for TFNS.
Find the right allocation for RSPF and TFNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer