PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPE vs. QDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RSPE vs. QDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RSPE vs. QDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
-0.79%14.58%10.87%13.97%-12.21%1.37%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
6.62%3.16%10.62%5.18%-0.50%1.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPE achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly lower than QDIV's 6.62% return.


RSPE

1D
2.26%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
2.62%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
11.69%
5Y*
10Y*

QDIV

1D
0.44%
1M
-4.13%
YTD
6.62%
6M
6.17%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
8.20%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RSPE vs. QDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSPE and QDIV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

RSPE vs. QDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPE
RSPE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
RSPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

QDIV
QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPE vs. QDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPEQDIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.48

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

0.80

+0.51

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.11

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.72

+0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.41

2.62

+2.79

RSPE vs. QDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPE Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the QDIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPE and QDIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPEQDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.48

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.43

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between RSPE and QDIV is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

RSPE vs. QDIV - Dividend Comparison

RSPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than QDIV's 2.99% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.66%1.63%1.57%1.91%1.83%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
2.99%3.13%2.88%3.26%3.02%2.44%3.06%2.84%1.30%

Drawdowns

RSPE vs. QDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum QDIV drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPE and QDIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPEQDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-41.20%

+18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.68%

-12.82%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

-5.38%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-5.55%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.53%

-0.57%

Volatility

RSPE vs. QDIV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) at 3.04%. This indicates that RSPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RSPEQDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

3.04%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

8.81%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.87%

16.71%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

15.35%

+1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

19.59%

-2.67%