PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPE vs. QDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPE vs. QDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with RSPE having a 16.35% return and QDIV slightly higher at 16.62%.


RSPE

1D
0.71%
1M
0.61%
6M
11.63%
YTD
16.35%
1Y
27.64%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.99%

QDIV

1D
0.51%
1M
4.41%
6M
9.29%
YTD
16.62%
1Y
22.22%
3Y*
10.58%
5Y*
8.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$41.14K$81.04K$128.34K
$309.58K$266.66K$342.82K

RSPE vs. QDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
16.35%14.58%10.87%13.97%-12.21%1.42%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
16.62%3.16%10.62%5.18%-0.50%0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPE and QDIV is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.86

The correlation between RSPE and QDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RSPE vs. QDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPE
QDIV

Technology

17.9%
10.7%

Industrials

17.4%
16.6%

Financial Services

15.5%
20.1%

Healthcare

13.4%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
22.1%

Real Estate

6.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.7%
2.1%

Communication Services

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

2.8%

-

Energy

-

8.9%

Technology

RSPE
17.9%
QDIV
10.7%

Industrials

RSPE
17.4%
QDIV
16.6%

Financial Services

RSPE
15.5%
QDIV
20.1%

Healthcare

RSPE
13.4%
QDIV
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPE
11.1%
QDIV
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

RSPE
6.8%
QDIV
22.1%

Real Estate

RSPE
6.8%
QDIV

-

Basic Materials

RSPE
4.7%
QDIV
2.1%

Communication Services

RSPE
3.6%
QDIV
3.5%

Utilities

RSPE
2.8%
QDIV

-

Energy

RSPE

-

QDIV
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPE vs. QDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPE
RSPE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RSPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

QDIV
QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPE vs. QDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPEQDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.32

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.80

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.61

7.14

+5.47

RSPE vs. QDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the QDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPE and QDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPE vs. QDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum QDIV drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPE and QDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPEQDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-41.20%

+18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-7.97%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

-16.81%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.05%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.86%

-5.47%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

3.12%

-0.92%

Volatility

RSPE vs. QDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) is 2.87%, while Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that RSPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPEQDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

4.87%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.26%

9.12%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

12.31%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

15.32%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

19.35%

-2.75%

RSPE vs. QDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RSPE and QDIV have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

RSPE vs. QDIV - Dividend Comparison

RSPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than QDIV's 2.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
2.79%3.13%2.88%3.26%3.02%2.44%3.06%2.84%1.30%
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.44%1.63%1.57%1.91%1.83%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPE and QDIV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QDIV has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to RSPE (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPE dropped -22.93% vs QDIV's -41.20%.

On 3-year performance, RSPE leads with 15.88% vs 10.58% for QDIV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, RSPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, RSPE has performed better with a 15.88% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPE and QDIV have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.44% for RSPE.

RSPE is categorized as S&P 500, while QDIV is Quality Factor. RSPE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while QDIV tracks S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X.

RSPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPE and QDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer