PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPE vs. HIBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPE vs. HIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPE achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than HIBL's 96.27% return.


RSPE

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.26%
YTD
12.08%
6M
13.64%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10Y*

HIBL

1D
-2.25%
1M
38.56%
YTD
96.27%
6M
98.56%
1Y
279.13%
3Y*
62.03%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPE vs. HIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
12.08%14.58%10.87%13.97%-12.21%1.37%
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
96.27%60.38%-0.40%81.02%-68.24%-9.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPE and HIBL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

0.86

The correlation between RSPE and HIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPE vs. HIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPE
HIBL

Technology

21.3%
45.8%

Financial Services

15.3%
12.5%

Industrials

14.7%
11.7%

Healthcare

12.9%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
0.6%

Real Estate

6.5%

-

Basic Materials

5.0%
4.6%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.7%

Utilities

3.1%
3.2%

Energy

-

2.2%

Technology

RSPE
21.3%
HIBL
45.8%

Financial Services

RSPE
15.3%
HIBL
12.5%

Industrials

RSPE
14.7%
HIBL
11.7%

Healthcare

RSPE
12.9%
HIBL
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RSPE
10.0%
HIBL
12.9%

Consumer Defensive

RSPE
7.3%
HIBL
0.6%

Real Estate

RSPE
6.5%
HIBL

-

Basic Materials

RSPE
5.0%
HIBL
4.6%

Communication Services

RSPE
3.7%
HIBL
3.7%

Utilities

RSPE
3.1%
HIBL
3.2%

Energy

RSPE

-

HIBL
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPE vs. HIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPE
RSPE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RSPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HIBL
HIBL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
HIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
HIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
HIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPE vs. HIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPEHIBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.47

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

8.96

-5.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

32.84

-21.04

RSPE vs. HIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the HIBL Sharpe Ratio of 4.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPE and HIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPEHIBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

4.26

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.24

+0.26

Drawdowns

RSPE vs. HIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum HIBL drawdown of -88.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPE and HIBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPEHIBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-88.27%

+65.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-31.39%

+22.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

-69.66%

+51.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-2.25%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-44.20%

+38.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

8.55%

-6.29%

Volatility

RSPE vs. HIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) is 2.97%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares (HIBL) has a volatility of 21.25%. This indicates that RSPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPEHIBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

21.25%

-18.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

50.46%

-41.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

66.16%

-53.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

82.16%

-65.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

91.89%

-75.14%

RSPE vs. HIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HIBL's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPE vs. HIBL - Dividend Comparison

RSPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than HIBL's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HIBL
Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares
1.18%2.43%0.82%0.69%0.00%0.06%0.19%0.19%
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.47%1.63%1.57%1.91%1.83%0.29%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPE and HIBL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HIBL has higher volatility (21.25%) compared to RSPE (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPE dropped -22.93% vs HIBL's -88.27%.

On 3-year performance, HIBL leads with 62.03% vs 16.43% for RSPE. On fees, RSPE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HIBL has performed better with a 62.03% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.12% for HIBL.

RSPE has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.18% for HIBL.

RSPE is categorized as S&P 500, while HIBL is Leveraged Equities. RSPE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while HIBL tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSPE and 1.12% for HIBL.

HIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.26 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPE and HIBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer