PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPE vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPE vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPE achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.


RSPE

1D
-0.17%
1M
6.26%
YTD
12.08%
6M
13.64%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10Y*

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPE vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
12.08%14.58%10.87%13.97%-12.21%1.37%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
42.58%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%-1.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPE and GSG is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

0.12

The correlation between RSPE and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPE vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPE
RSPE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RSPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPE vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSPEGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

5.47

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

14.39

-2.60

RSPE vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPE Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPE and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSPEGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.26

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

-0.09

+0.59

Drawdowns

RSPE vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPE drawdown since its inception was -22.93%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPE and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPEGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-89.62%

+66.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-9.46%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.58%

-14.94%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-56.95%

+56.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-63.71%

+57.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

3.59%

-1.33%

Volatility

RSPE vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSPE) is 2.97%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that RSPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPEGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

7.65%

-4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

20.42%

-11.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

22.95%

-10.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.75%

22.61%

-5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.75%

22.03%

-5.28%

RSPE vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPE vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

RSPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSPE
Invesco ESG S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.47%1.63%1.57%1.91%1.83%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


RSPE and GSG have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to RSPE (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPE dropped -22.93% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 3-year performance, GSG leads with 19.31% vs 16.43% for RSPE. On fees, RSPE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSPE has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GSG has performed better with a 19.31% return vs 16.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

RSPE has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

RSPE is categorized as S&P 500, while GSG is Commodities. RSPE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for RSPE and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPE and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer