PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
RSPD vs. VICE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

RSPD vs. VICE

Last updated Aug 4, 2026
Documentation

RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) and VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RSPD is passively managed, while VICE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPD returned 4.22%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for VICE. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for VICE.

Performance

RSPD vs. VICE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than VICE's 4.56% return.

RSPD

1D
1.06%
1M
1.79%
6M
-2.22%
YTD
1.19%
1Y
6.06%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
8.14%
ALL TIME*
8.32%

VICE

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.98%
6M
2.70%
YTD
4.56%
1Y
-4.45%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
1.94%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
4.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

RSPD

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF
$3.23M$2.98M$3.50M

VICE

AdvisorShares Vice ETF
$20.36K$15.57K$15.59K

RSPD vs. VICE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF		1.19%7.98%13.37%22.55%-24.03%28.75%11.43%25.88%-8.79%1.96%
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF		4.56%1.56%18.27%3.01%-18.28%8.50%22.45%20.05%-16.93%4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPD and VICE is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between RSPD and VICE has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RSPD vs. VICE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
RSPD
VICE

Consumer Cyclical

93.6%
45.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
7.2%

Technology

2.2%
4.7%

Industrials

1.8%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

5.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

31.2%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

6.3%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPD
93.6%
VICE
45.3%

Communication Services

RSPD
2.4%
VICE
7.2%

Technology

RSPD
2.2%
VICE
4.7%

Industrials

RSPD
1.8%
VICE

-

Financial Services

RSPD
0.1%
VICE

-

Basic Materials

RSPD

-

VICE
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

RSPD

-

VICE
31.2%

Energy

RSPD

-

VICE

-

Healthcare

RSPD

-

VICE

-

Real Estate

RSPD

-

VICE
6.3%

Utilities

RSPD

-

VICE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF

AdvisorShares Vice ETF

Often compared with RSPD:
RSPD vs. RSPRSPD vs. RSPTRSPD vs. XLYRSPD vs. VTIRSPD vs. SPHQRSPD vs. VCRRSPD vs. FDIS
Often compared with VICE:
VICE vs. INDEXVICE vs. PBJVICE vs. RICKVICE vs. PXWIXVICE vs. USAIVICE vs. SPYVICE vs. VGT

Return for Risk

RSPD vs. VICE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
RSPD
RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
VICE
VICE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
VICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
VICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPD vs. VICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

RSPDVICEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.32
-0.32

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.64
-0.37

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.96

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

-0.33

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

-0.54

+1.53

RSPD vs. VICE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPD Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the VICE Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPD and VICE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPD vs. VICE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than VICE's maximum drawdown of -38.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and VICE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

RSPDVICEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.00%

-38.27%

-29.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-13.59%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.01%

-16.55%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

-29.92%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-7.31%

+3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.67%

-12.26%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.14%

8.19%

-2.05%

Volatility

RSPD vs. VICE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) at 4.42%. This indicates that RSPD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

RSPDVICEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

4.42%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.62%

10.13%

+4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.82%

13.82%

+5.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

17.57%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.13%

19.12%

+4.01%

RSPD vs. VICE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than VICE's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSPD vs. VICE - Dividend Comparison

RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than VICE's 0.75% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPD
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF		0.86%1.08%0.84%1.09%0.99%0.53%0.81%1.59%1.67%1.45%1.27%1.37%
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF		0.75%0.79%1.46%1.69%0.96%0.99%0.00%2.47%1.72%0.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

RSPD and VICE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSPD has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to VICE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPD dropped -68.00% vs VICE's -38.27%.

On 5-year performance, RSPD leads with 4.22% vs 1.94% for VICE. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RSPD has performed better with a 4.22% return vs 1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.75% for VICE.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.99% for VICE.

RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPD and VICE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer