RSPD vs. AWAY
RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) and AWAY (ETFMG Travel Tech ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC while AWAY tracks the Prime Travel Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RSPD returned 4.22%/yr vs -5.40%/yr for AWAY. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. RSPD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AWAY.
Performance
RSPD vs. AWAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPD achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than AWAY's -3.76% return.
RSPD
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- 8.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.32%
AWAY
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- -3.76%
- 1Y
- -4.59%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -5.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $104.86K | $79.00K | $129.32K | |
| $3.23M | $2.98M | $3.50M |
RSPD vs. AWAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.19% | 7.98% | 13.37% | 22.55% | -24.03% | 28.75% | 11.40% |
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | -3.76% | -3.36% | 10.44% | 17.94% | -32.25% | -5.91% | 3.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPD and AWAY is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between RSPD and AWAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPD vs. AWAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPD
AWAY
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
RSPD
AWAY
Communication Services
RSPD
AWAY
Technology
RSPD
AWAY
Industrials
RSPD
AWAY
Financial Services
RSPD
AWAY
Basic Materials
RSPD
-
AWAY
-
Consumer Defensive
RSPD
-
AWAY
-
Energy
RSPD
-
AWAY
-
Healthcare
RSPD
-
AWAY
-
Real Estate
RSPD
-
AWAY
-
Utilities
RSPD
-
AWAY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPD vs. AWAY — Risk / Return Rank
RSPD
AWAY
RSPD vs. AWAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) and ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSPD | AWAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.99 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | -0.14 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.99 | -0.25 | +1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSPD vs. AWAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPD drawdown since its inception was -68.00%, which is greater than AWAY's maximum drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPD and AWAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPD | AWAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.00% | -56.57% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -32.83% | +19.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.01% | -32.83% | +11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.41% | -49.10% | +14.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -41.94% | +38.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -36.49% | +25.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.14% | 18.41% | -12.27% |
Volatility
RSPD vs. AWAY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) is 6.00%, while ETFMG Travel Tech ETF (AWAY) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that RSPD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AWAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPD | AWAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.00% | 8.21% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 19.72% | -5.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.82% | 23.31% | -4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 26.90% | -4.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.13% | 31.66% | -8.53% |
RSPD vs. AWAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AWAY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPD vs. AWAY - Dividend Comparison
RSPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while AWAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWAY ETFMG Travel Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.86% | 1.08% | 0.84% | 1.09% | 0.99% | 0.53% | 0.81% | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.45% | 1.27% | 1.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPD and AWAY have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AWAY has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to RSPD (6.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPD dropped -68.00% vs AWAY's -56.57%.
On 5-year performance, RSPD leads with 4.22% vs -5.40% for AWAY. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPD has been the lower-risk option at 6.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RSPD has performed better with a 4.22% return vs -5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AWAY.
RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for AWAY.
RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC, while AWAY tracks Prime Travel Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPD and 0.75% for AWAY.
RSPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPD and AWAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer