PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPA vs. URSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPA vs. URSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (URSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly lower than URSP's 22.76% return.


RSPA

1D
0.22%
1M
0.86%
6M
8.76%
YTD
11.50%
1Y
19.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.97%

URSP

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.25%
6M
15.52%
YTD
22.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.20M$12.25M$9.83M
$2.68M$2.91M$2.10M

RSPA vs. URSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RSPA and URSP is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPA vs. URSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPA
RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

URSP

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPA vs. URSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (URSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPAURSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.14

RSPA vs. URSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPA vs. URSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, roughly equal to the maximum URSP drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and URSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPAURSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-15.72%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-2.52%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-2.89%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

Volatility

RSPA vs. URSP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPAURSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

23.34%

-13.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.68%

23.34%

-10.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

23.34%

-10.66%

RSPA vs. URSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than URSP's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPA vs. URSP - Dividend Comparison

RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%, more than URSP's 0.91% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSPA and URSP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RSPA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RSPA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URSP.

RSPA has the higher dividend yield at 8.93%, compared with 0.91% for URSP.

RSPA is categorized as S&P 500, while URSP is Leveraged Equities. Both ETFs track S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RSPA and 0.95% for URSP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPA and URSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer