RSPA vs. PBFR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR).

RSPA and PBFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPA is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Jul 17, 2025. PBFR is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 11, 2024.

Performance

RSPA vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RSPA vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	0.42%	11.07%	3.68%
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	-0.75%	10.44%	4.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than PBFR's -0.75% return.

RSPA

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -4.59%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 2.58%
• 1Y: 11.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBFR

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -1.46%
• YTD: -0.75%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 10.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSPA vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.

PBFR

PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF

RSPA

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF

Return for Risk

RSPA vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSPA

RSPA Risk / Return Rank: 49
RSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
RSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
RSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 57

PBFR

PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 79
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSPA vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSPA	PBFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.78	1.34	-0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	1.99	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.35	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.08	1.84	-0.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.32	10.86	-5.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSPA vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPA Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the PBFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPA and PBFR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSPA	PBFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78	1.34	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	1.20	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between RSPA and PBFR is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RSPA vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF	9.37%	9.14%	4.03%
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%

Drawdowns

RSPA vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and PBFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSPA	PBFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.37%	-8.50%	-6.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.45%	-6.15%	-5.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.81%	-1.56%	-3.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.16%	-0.68%	-1.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	1.04%	+1.28%

Volatility

RSPA vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR) at 2.42%. This indicates that RSPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSPA	PBFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.81%	2.42%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.51%	3.46%	+4.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.79%	8.18%	+6.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.39%	7.13%	+6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.39%	7.13%	+6.26%