RSPA vs. DYNF
RSPA (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF) and DYNF (BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSPA is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, while DYNF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. RSPA is passively managed, while DYNF is actively managed. Over the past year, RSPA returned 18.38% vs 30.19% for DYNF. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSPA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DYNF.
Performance
RSPA vs. DYNF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPA achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly lower than DYNF's 11.55% return.
RSPA
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DYNF
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 26.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.04%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPA vs. DYNF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 7.86% | 11.07% | 3.68% |
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 11.55% | 20.00% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPA and DYNF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between RSPA and DYNF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
RSPA vs. DYNF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RSPA
DYNF
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
RSPA
DYNF
Industrials
RSPA
DYNF
Financial Services
RSPA
DYNF
Healthcare
RSPA
DYNF
Consumer Cyclical
RSPA
DYNF
Consumer Defensive
RSPA
DYNF
Real Estate
RSPA
DYNF
Utilities
RSPA
DYNF
Energy
RSPA
DYNF
Basic Materials
RSPA
DYNF
Communication Services
RSPA
DYNF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPA vs. DYNF — Risk / Return Rank
RSPA
DYNF
RSPA vs. DYNF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) and BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPA | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.50 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 16.97 | -5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPA | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.44 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.83 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
RSPA vs. DYNF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPA drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, smaller than the maximum DYNF drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPA and DYNF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPA | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.37% | -34.72% | +19.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.21% | -8.67% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.57% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -5.98% | +3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.78% | -0.23% |
Volatility
RSPA vs. DYNF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) is 1.95%, while BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF (DYNF) has a volatility of 3.27%. This indicates that RSPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DYNF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPA | DYNF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.95% | 3.27% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.66% | 9.55% | -2.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.36% | 12.44% | -3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 17.50% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.00% | 19.90% | -6.90% |
RSPA vs. DYNF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DYNF's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSPA vs. DYNF - Dividend Comparison
RSPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than DYNF's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DYNF BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF | 0.89% | 1.01% | 0.65% | 1.11% | 1.66% | 2.89% | 1.52% | 1.22% |
RSPA Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF | 8.98% | 9.14% | 4.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPA and DYNF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DYNF has higher volatility (3.27%) compared to RSPA (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPA dropped -15.37% vs DYNF's -34.72%.
On 1-year performance, DYNF leads with 30.19% vs 18.38% for RSPA. On fees, RSPA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RSPA has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DYNF has performed better with a 30.19% return vs 18.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSPA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DYNF.
RSPA has the higher dividend yield at 8.98%, compared with 0.89% for DYNF.
RSPA is categorized as S&P 500, while DYNF is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RSPA and 0.30% for DYNF.
DYNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPA and DYNF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer