RSMR vs. QCLN
RSMR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - RSMR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF Trust (RSP) Price Return, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RSMR returned 14.52% vs 106.69% for QCLN. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RSMR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for QCLN.
Performance
RSMR vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSMR achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 46.37% return.
RSMR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- 14.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QCLN
- 1D
- 1.59%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 46.37%
- 6M
- 38.49%
- 1Y
- 106.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 17.54%
RSMR vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March | 6.89% | 8.19% |
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 46.37% | 50.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSMR and QCLN is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025 | 0.63 |
The correlation between RSMR and QCLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSMR vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank
RSMR
QCLN
RSMR vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March (RSMR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RSMR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.32 | 6.54 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.39 | 21.21 | -3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RSMR vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSMR drawdown since its inception was -9.09%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSMR and QCLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSMR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.09% | -76.18% | +67.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.37% | -16.40% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -56.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -24.38% | +23.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.81% | -43.40% | +42.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 5.05% | -4.21% |
Volatility
RSMR vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March (RSMR) is 1.83%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 16.78%. This indicates that RSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSMR | QCLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.83% | 16.78% | -14.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 29.37% | -24.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.72% | 36.95% | -30.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.50% | 38.45% | -27.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.50% | 35.18% | -24.68% |
RSMR vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSMR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QCLN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSMR vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison
RSMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QCLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.87% | 0.76% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.30% | 0.85% | 1.03% | 0.45% | 1.24% | 0.72% |
RSMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSMR and QCLN have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QCLN has higher volatility (16.78%) compared to RSMR (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSMR dropped -9.09% vs QCLN's -76.18%.
On 1-year performance, QCLN leads with 106.69% vs 14.52% for RSMR. On fees, QCLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, RSMR has been the lower-risk option at 1.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 106.69% return vs 14.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QCLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for RSMR.
QCLN has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for RSMR.
RSMR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. RSMR tracks Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF Trust (RSP) Price Return, while QCLN tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for RSMR and 0.59% for QCLN.
QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSMR and QCLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer